Avaliação do método de Penman Monteith FAO 56 com dados faltosos e de métodos alternativos na estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência no Submédio Vale do São Francisco

@inproceedings{Fsica2015AvaliaoDM,
  title={Avaliaç{\~a}o do m{\'e}todo de Penman Monteith FAO 56 com dados faltosos e de m{\'e}todos alternativos na estimativa da evapotranspiraç{\~a}o de refer{\^e}ncia no Subm{\'e}dio Vale do S{\~a}o Francisco},
  author={Geograf{\'i}a F{\'i}sica and Jos{\'e} Edson and F. M. de Morais and Thieres George and Freire Clementino da Silva and Luciana Sandra Bastos de Souza and Magna Soelma and Beserra de Moura and Wellington Jairo da Silva Diniz and Carlos Andr{\'e} and Alves de Souza},
  year={2015}
}
Objective to evaluate the performance of the Penman Monteith method parameterized on the 56 FAO Bulletin (PMFAO56) with the absence of data and of alternative methods for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration in the Submedium Valley of San Francisco. Weather variables for the period March 2003 to April 2008 were used of five automatic stations belonging to the network of Embrapa semi-arid. In the evaluation of this method were considered to be different combinations as the lack of… CONTINUE READING