Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability

@article{Tversky1973AvailabilityAH,
  title={Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability},
  author={Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},
  year={1973},
  volume={5},
  pages={207-232}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Availability heuristic in judgments of set size and frequency of occurrence.
The availability heuristic has been widely cited as an important factor in the judgment process. However, the evidence that availability is important in judging category size is not fully convincing.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
TLDR
Three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty are described: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development.
A Replication and Extension of the Inducement of the Availability Heuristic
Abstract : The availability of an event in an observer's memory is postulated to be one of the bases for estimates of its frequency of past occurrence or the probability of future occurrence. In a
An availability bias in professional judgment.
When branches of a fault tree are pruned, subjects do not fully transfer the probability of those branches to the ‘all other’ category. This underestimation of the catch-all probability has been
Direct measures of availability and judgments of category frequency
Tversky and Kahneman (1973) have proposed that people judge the numerosity of categories by the availability of category instances. The present study tests this hypothesis using several direct
Studies in subjective probability l: Prediction of random events
When students are asked to predict the outcome of a random event, where all alternatives are equally probable (lotteries), they tend to choose central, “representative” values, and avoid extreme
Heuristics and Biases: Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
This article presents a new theory of subjective probability according to which different descriptions of the same event can give rise to different judgments. The experimental evidence confirms the
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness
On the psychology of prediction
In this paper, we explore the rules that determine intuitive predictions and judgments of confidence and contrast these rules to the normative principles of statistical prediction. Two classes of
Recall and judged frequency of implicitly occurring words
BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS
“Suppose you have run an experiment on 20 subjects, and have obtained a significant result which confirms your theory ( z = 2.23, p If you feel that the probability is somewhere around .85, you may
JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY BETWEEN RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES.
TLDR
Risk responses identified using contingent response strategy is called contingency plans and some responses are designed for use only if certain events occur.
Some correlates of item repetition in free-recall learning
Pronunciation and apparent frequency
RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL
TLDR
A critique of two popular "strength" theories, one which relates recall and recognition to the strength of one and the same memory trace, and another which relates only recognition memory to a similar strength measure are offered.
...
...