Automatic versus volitional orienting and the production of the inhibition-of-return effect.

@article{Fitzgeorge2009AutomaticVV,
  title={Automatic versus volitional orienting and the production of the inhibition-of-return effect.},
  author={Lyndsay Fitzgeorge and Eric Buckolz},
  journal={Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale},
  year={2009},
  volume={63 2},
  pages={94-102}
}
A single, to-be-ignored peripheral flash (i.e., cue) reflexively attracts an orienting response (oculomotor/attention/head turn) that ultimately causes reaction time delays to target stimuli that later arise at this cued location, in relation to when the target appears at a new position (i.e., the inhibition-of-return [IOR] effect). The basic question posed here dealt with whether an IOR effect is also produced following volitional orienting. Results from paired cue-trial stimulations, one a… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 references

Vector averaging of inhibition of return.

Psychonomic bulletin & review • 2005
View 12 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Inhibition of return

Scholarpedia • 2000
View 7 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance • 1989
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of “inhibition of return” without saccade inhibition

R. Rafal, J. Davies, J. Lauder
Visual Cognition, • 2006
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…