Authorship Attribution under the Rules of Evidence: Empirical Approaches in a Layperson's Legal System
@article{Howald2009AuthorshipAU, title={Authorship Attribution under the Rules of Evidence: Empirical Approaches in a Layperson's Legal System}, author={B. Howald}, journal={International Journal of Speech Language and The Law}, year={2009}, volume={15}, pages={219-247} }
All documentary evidence admitted at trial must be authenticated, i.e. it must be demonstrated that the document is ‘what its proponent claims’ it to be. For authorship attribution, this means that it can be demonstrated that the document in question has or has not been authored by a specific person. Among the different methodologies addressing this question of ‘who wrote it,’ those practiced by law enforcement specialists are often not scientifically reasoned, tested nor empirically sound… CONTINUE READING
8 Citations
Stylistics versus Statistics: A corpus linguistic approach to combining techniques in forensic authorship analysis using Enron emails
- Psychology
- 2014
- 5
- PDF
An evaluation measurement in automatic text classification for authorship attribution
- Psychology
- 2016
- 1
Resources and constraints in linguistic identity performance: a theory of authorship
- Sociology
- 2018
- 6
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
The Linguist on the Witness Stand: Forensic Linguistics in American Courts
- Sociology, History
- 2002
- 34
- PDF
Computer-Based Authorship Attribution Without Lexical Measures
- Computer Science
- Comput. Humanit.
- 2001
- 266
- PDF
Automatic Text Categorization in Terms of Genre and Author
- Computer Science
- Computational Linguistics
- 2000
- 438
- PDF