• Corpus ID: 53334791

Authoritarian Breakdown : Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument

@inproceedings{Geddes1999AuthoritarianB,
  title={Authoritarian Breakdown : Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument},
  author={Barbara Geddes},
  year={1999}
}
This paper continues a project on the links between different authoritarian institutional structures and the likelihood and mode of transition to democracy. In earlier work, I have argued that different types of authoritarian government have different effects on the incentives confronting regime supporters when faced with challenges to the status quo. To summarize that argument, military regimes tend to split when challenged, personalist regimes to circle the wagons, and single-party regimes to… 

Tables from this paper

Peaceful Parties and Puzzling Personalists
Reiter and Stam advance the study of the conflict behavior of authoritarian regimes in two ways. First, they clearly demonstrate the importance of using directed dyad data sets for studying mixed
Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992
What are the most important sources of institutional variation among authoritarian regimes, and how do such institutions influence these dictatorships' propensity to initiate military disputes? This
Dealing with Tyranny: International Sanctions and the Survival of Authoritarian Rulers
This paper examines whether economic sanctions destabilize authoritarian rulers. We argue that the effect of sanctions is mediated by the type of authoritarian regime against which sanctions are
The Logic of Authoritarian Bargains: A Test of a Structural Model
Dictatorships do not survive by repression alone. Rather, dictatorial rule is often explained as an authoritarian bargain by which citizens relinquish political rights for economic security. The
Parallel Authoritarian Institutions : An Explanation of Mexico ’ s Authoritarian Regime Durability and Breakdown
Party politicians in dominant party autocracies are not always in charge of taking the most important authoritative decisions in a country. Instead, it is the bureaucracy -staffed by non-party menthe
Can you trust a dictator: A strategic model of authoritarian regimes’ signing and compliance with international treaties
Building on recent studies that focus on institutional variation among authoritarian regimes, this paper asks whether this variation leads to meaningful differences in the tendencies to reach and
Can You Trust a Dictator : An Endogenous Model of Authoritarian Regimes ’ Signing and Compliance with International Treaties
I combine Lai and Slater's (2006) two-dimensional authoritarian typology with Putnam's (1988) logic of two-level games to build a theory of variation in regime tendencies to reach and comply with
Authoritarian collapse: concepts, causes and knowledge accumulation
This paper presents the following arguments. First, it is more productive to compare the recent protests in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) to mass mobilization and authoritarian breakdown
Clenching the Fists of Dissent: Political Unrest, Repression, and the Evolution to Civil War
Previous scholarship has long concentrated on the behaviors of belligerents during regime-dissident interactions. While much of the progress in the literature concentrated on the micro-level
Democracy and Redistribution: The Role of Regime Revisited
This study challenges a well-supported institutionalist theory in comparative politics that links democracy with higher levels of redistribution as well as studies that link authoritarianism with
...
...