Corpus ID: 42802423

Author : : Dr

@inproceedings{Jargin2017Author,
  title={Author : : Dr},
  author={S. Jargin},
  year={2017}
}
Strictly observed realistic safety standards are more helpful for the public health than excessive restrictions that would be disregarded. Today’s radiation safety standards are based on the linear no-threshold theory (LNT): extrapolation of dose-response relationships down to low doses, where such relationships are unproven and can be inverse due to hormesis. Hormesis is theoretically founded for environmental factors causing adaptation to a background level or some average from the past when… Expand
3 Citations
Genocide Prevention and Western National Security: the Limitations of Making R2P All About Us
The case for turning R2P and genocide prevention from principle to practice usually rests on the invocation of moral norms and duties to others. Calls have been made by some analysts to abandon thisExpand
The US Pivot and its Implications for the Current East Asian Security Architecture
After the end of the Second World War, the US became the chief guarantor of peace and security in Asia-Pacific by preserving a continental balance of power. The “San Francisco System” signed in SanExpand
Smart Paint Shops — Improving Quality, Flexibility and Efficiency
  • Pavel Svejda
  • Engineering
  • IST International Surface Technology
  • 2017
Artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, electric vehicles, the Internet of Things, the fourth industrial revolution: we are living and working in an increasingly digitised world. ProductionExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 112 REFERENCES
Hormesis and radiation safety norms
  • S. Jargin
  • Economics, Medicine
  • Human & experimental toxicology
  • 2012
TLDR
It is concluded that radiation safety norms are exceedingly restrictive and should be revised to become more realistic and workable and elevation of the limits must be accompanied by measures guaranteeing their strict observance. Expand
Dose and dose-rate effectiveness of radiation: first objectivity then conclusions -
TLDR
The LNT and under-estimation of DDREF tend to exaggerate radiationrelated health risks at low dose and dose rates exposures, and future risk estimates should be based on direct comparisons of experimental data from acute and protracted exposures. Expand
A brief review of radiation hormesis
  • D. Jolly, J. Meyer
  • Medicine
  • Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine
  • 2010
TLDR
Physical, experimental and epidemiological evidence for and against radiation hormesis is reviewed and implications with regards to radiation protection are discussed and it is important that the matter be resolved. Expand
It's Time for a New Low-Dose-Radiation Risk Assessment Paradigm—One that Acknowledges Hormesis
  • B. Scott
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2008
TLDR
A novel, nonlinear, hormetic relative risk model for radiation-induced cancers is discussed in the context of establishing new radiation exposure limits for nuclear workers and the public. Expand
Atomic Bomb Health Benefits
  • T. Luckey
  • Medicine
  • Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
  • 2008
TLDR
These studies of atomic bomb survivors show increased health in Japanese survivors of atomic bombs, and each study exhibits a threshold that repudiates the LNT dogma. Expand
The Relevance of Occupational Epidemiology to Radiation Protection Standards
TLDR
Evidence from worker studies suggests that excess radiation-related cancer deaths occur at doses below the current occupational limits; low-dose effects have also been seen in studies of childhood cancers in relation to fetal irradiation and should be considered in revising current radiation protection standards. Expand
Database of Radiogenic Cancer in Experimental Animals Exposed to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation
TLDR
A comprehensive database of animal carcinogenesis experiments was assembled involving exposure to different types of ionizing gradation, and the shape of the dose-response relationship for radiation carcinogenesis at low doses in experimental animals is assessed. Expand
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know
  • D. Brenner, R. Doll, +12 authors M. Zaider
  • Medicine, Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2003
TLDR
The difficulties involved in quantifying the risks of low-dose radiation are reviewed, a linear extrapolation of cancer risks from intermediate to very low doses currently appears to be the most appropriate methodology, and a linearity assumption is not necessarily the most conservative approach. Expand
TOWARD IMPROVED IONIZING RADIATION SAFETY STANDARDS
TLDR
It is recommended that the ICRP consider revising its position on ionizing radiation safety standards in light of the fact that the increased risk of cancer observed in the atomic bomb survivor studies was primarily the result of acute high dose rate promotion of ongoing biological processes that lead to cancer rather than cancer induction. Expand
[The threshold for radiation stochastic effects: arguments "pro" and "contra". Applied realization].
TLDR
The analysis of the data available in the literature and the author's findings concerning the issue of a shape of the dose stochastic effect curve in the range of low levels of radiation concludes that the threshold conception is more reliable than the non-threshold one. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...