Austronesian and Chinese words for the millets

@inproceedings{Sagart2017AustronesianAC,
  title={Austronesian and Chinese words for the millets},
  author={Laurent Sagart and Tze-fu Hsu and Yuan-Ching Tsai and Yue-ie Hsing},
  year={2017}
}
After reviewing recent evidence from related disciplines arguing for an origin of the Austronesian peoples in northeastern China, this paper discusses the Proto-Austronesian and Old Chinese names of the millets, Setaria italica and Panicum miliaceum. Partly based on linguistic data collected in Taiwan by the authors, proposed Proto-Austronesian cognate sets for millet terms are re-evaluated and the Proto-Austronesian sets are identified. The reasons for the earlier confusion among Old Chinese… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES

Some Recent Proposals Concerning the Classification of the Austronesian Languages

The comparative method is a relatively well-defined tool that has been employed successfully in the classification of languages for two centuries. In recent years, there have been several proposals

The Austronesian Homeland: A Linguistic Perspective

THE DISCOVERY OF the Indo-European language family has been called one of the great intellectual achievements of the nineteenth century. In important respects it contributed to the Romantic movement

Austronesian culture history: Some linguistic inferences and their relations to the archaeological record

Abstract Although subject to limitations of its own, historical linguistics can illuminate fragments of the human cultural past that are often irrecoverable from the archaeological record. Where both

Early Austronesians: into and out of Taiwan.

The Higher Phylogeny of Austronesian and the Position of Tai-Kadai

TLDR
In the proposed phylogeny, Malayo-Polynesian is a branch of Muic, a taxon that also includes NE Formosan (Kavalan plus Ketagalan), and further evidence that the Tai-Kadai languages, contrary to common sense, are a subgroup of Austronesian is presented.

Linguistic and Arcaeological Evidence for Rice and Millet in Taiwan

Both linguistic and archaeological evidence indicates that rice and millet were domesticated plants available to Proto-Austronesian speakers in Taiwan about 5,000 years ago or earlier. Cultivation of

Beyond the Austronesian homeland : The austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology

TW lhen it comes to questions of distant genetic relationship in linguistics I must confess that I have always come down very decidedly on the side of skepticism. To some extent this orientation may

THE HIGHER PHYLOGENY OF AUSTRONESIAN AND THE POSITION OF TAI-KADAI: ANOTHER LOOK1

Sagart (2004) introduced a radical new view of the higher-level branching of Austronesian languages that has been challenged by others, but that he has continued to maintain and develop over the

The spread of agriculture in eastern Asia: Archaeological bases for hypothetical farmer/language dispersals

Millets and rice were important for the demographic history of China. This review draws on current archaeobotanical evidence for rice and millets across China, Korea, eastern Russia, Taiwan, Mainland

Language Phylogenies Reveal Expansion Pulses and Pauses in Pacific Settlement

TLDR
The results are robust to assumptions about the rooting and calibration of the trees and demonstrate the combined power of linguistic scholarship, database technologies, and computational phylogenetic methods for resolving questions about human prehistory.
...