Corpus ID: 237532124

Auditing Fairness and Imputation Impact in Predictive Analytics for Higher Education

  title={Auditing Fairness and Imputation Impact in Predictive Analytics for Higher Education},
  author={Hadis Anahideh and Nazanin Nezami and Denisa G{\'a}ndara},
Nowadays, colleges and universities use predictive analytics in a variety of ways to increase student success rates. Despite the potentials for predictive analytics, there exist two major barriers to their adoption in higher education: (a) the lack of democratization in deployment, and (b) the potential to exacerbate inequalities. Education researchers and policymakers encounter numerous challenges in deploying predictive modeling in practice. These challenges present in different steps of… 


Towards Accurate and Fair Prediction of College Success: Evaluating Different Sources of Student Data
This work examined the utility of institutional data, learning management system (LMS) data, and survey data for accurately and fairly predicting short-term and long-term student success and found that institutional data and LMS data both have decent predictive power, but survey data shows very little predictive utility.
Ethics and Fairness in Assessing Learning Outcomes in Higher Education
Fairness is one of the most important quality criteria of assessments and a necessary condition for valid test score interpretations. In this paper, we describe findings related to an assessment of N
Implications of AI (un-)fairness in higher education admissions: the effects of perceived AI (un-)fairness on exit, voice and organizational reputation
Concerning the subsequent effects of fairness perceptions, it is found that distributive fairness as well as procedural fairness perceptions have a negative impact on the intention to protest against an ADM system, whereas (2) only Procedural fairness perceptions negatively affect the likelihood of exiting and (3) distributive unfair, but not procedural fairness perception have a positive effect on organizational reputation.
Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making
There are design opportunities in this disconnect, such as in supporting the tracking of concept drift in secondary data sources, and in building usable transparency tools to identify risks and incorporate domain knowledge, aimed both at managers and at the 'street-level bureaucrats' on the frontlines of public service.
Reporting the Use of Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in Higher Education Research
It is revealed that the field has yet to make substantial use of this technique despite common employment of quantitative analysis, and that in research where MI is used, many recommended MI reporting practices are not being followed.
Mind the gap: gender disparities still to be addressed in UK Higher Education geography
This paper evidences persistent gender inequalities in UK higher education (HE) geography departments. The two key sources of data used are: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) data for staff
Missing the missing values: The ugly duckling of fairness in machine learning
It is found that rows containing missing values are usually fairer than the rest, which should discourage the consideration of missing values as the uncomfortable ugly data that different techniques and libraries for handling algorithmic bias get rid of at the first occasion.
On the Applicability of Machine Learning Fairness Notions
This paper is a survey of fairness notions that addresses the question of "which notion of fairness is most suited to a given real-world scenario and why?".
Fairness through Causal Awareness: Learning Causal Latent-Variable Models for Biased Data
It is shown experimentally that fairness-aware causal modeling provides better estimates of the causal effects between the sensitive attribute, the treatment, and the outcome, and further present evidence that estimating these causal effects can help learn policies that are both more accurate and fair, when presented with a historically biased dataset.
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis.
The present meta-analysis demonstrated the presence of a stable female advantage in school marks while also identifying critical moderators, contradicting claims of a recent "boy crisis" in school achievement.