Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?

@article{Tunis2013AssociationOS,
  title={Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?},
  author={Adam S. Tunis and Matthew D F McInnes and Ramez Hanna and K Zahr Aldin Esmail},
  journal={Radiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={269 2},
  pages={413-26}
}
PURPOSE To evaluate whether completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals has changed since publication of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement; a secondary objective is to evaluate whether completeness of reporting (ie, PRISMA) is associated with study… CONTINUE READING