Assimilation and Contrast in a Test of the Hostile Media Effect

@article{Gunther2009AssimilationAC,
  title={Assimilation and Contrast in a Test of the Hostile Media Effect},
  author={Albert C. Gunther and Nicole Miller and Janice L. Liebhart},
  journal={Communication Research},
  year={2009},
  volume={36},
  pages={747 - 764}
}
Recent empirical research has vividly demonstrated the hostile media effect—the tendency for individuals highly involved in a controversial issue to see media coverage of that issue as hostile to their own point of view. This type of contrast bias—along with its assimilation counterpart—is hypothesized to stem from preexisting partisan attitudes coupled with other explanatory factors, including perceived reach of the message and characteristics of the source. To test these predictions, we… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Competing Identity Cues in the Hostile Media Phenomenon: Source, Nationalism, and Perceived Bias in News Coverage of Foreign Affairs

ABSTRACT The global media ecology offers news audiences a wide variety of sources for international news and interpretation of foreign affairs, and this kind of news coverage may increase the

A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect

Some 30 years ago, Vallone, Ross, and Lepper (1985) conducted a pioneering study of the hostile media effect in which they demonstrated that partisans perceive media coverage as unfairly biased

A Self-Categorization Explanation for the Hostile Media Effect

The hostile media effect is a phenomenon in which partisans on both sides of an issue perceive neutral media reports to be biased against their side. Three experiments were performed to test a

Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence, and Political Talk: Expanding the Corrective Action Hypothesis

The corrective action hypothesis predicts that hostile media perceptions and presumed media influence will be positively related to expressive political behaviors. According to this hypothesis, the

Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research

A considerable number of studies have provided empirical evidence of people's perception of media bias—the hostile media effect (HME). This study conducts a meta-analysis of 34 HME studies. HME, in

Examining the Hostile Media Effect as an Intergroup Phenomenon: The Role of Ingroup Identification and Status

The present approach conceptualizes the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon. Two empirical studies, one quasi-experimental and one experimental, examine the hostile media effect in the

Politically Motivated Selective Exposure and Perceived Media Bias

If the individuals who are most likely to perceive media bias no longer encounter, via selective exposure, media content they might consider biased, why are perceptions of media bias so pervasive? We

Partisan Evaluation of Partisan Information

TLDR
The data supported an expected hostile media perception in the case of “fair and balanced” information, but different patterns in the other bias conditions suggest that content variables can sometimes disarm defensive processing.

Hostile Media or Hostile Source? Bias Perception of Shared News

An experiment was conducted with college students to examine the effects of source and user comments on the perceptions of a shared news story embedded in a blog post. When the shared news was

Hostile media perception and partisan processing of media messages: Self-categorization and involvement in political and religious debates over same-sex marriage and poverty

Hostile media perception (HMP) is a well-documented perceptual media effect. Yet, an understanding of its causal mechanisms has been difficult to ascertain. This study examined two promising,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES

Mapping Boundaries of the Hostile Media Effect

The hostile media perception, the tendency for partisans to judge mass media coverage as unfavorable to their own point of view, has been vividly demonstrated but not well explained. This contrast

The Causes of Hostile Media Judgments

This research investigated the mechanisms involved in the hostile media effect, in which partisans tend to judge news coverage as biased against their own side. Subjects on both sides of the

The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.

TLDR
Charges of media bias, it was concluded, may result from the operation of basic cognitive and perceptual mechanisms, mechanisms that should prove relevant to perceptions of fairness or objectivity in a wide range of mediation and negotiation contexts.

Broad Reach or Biased Source? Decomposing the Hostile Media Effect

This experiment examined theoretical questions surrounding the hostile media effect-the tendency of partisans on a controversial issue to see news coverage of that issue as biased in favor of the

Why Partisans See Mass Media as Biased

TLDR
Using new field-experiment tests with groups of partisans who either supported or opposed the use of genetically modified foods, evidence of selective categorization and different standards generally was found, however, only selective categization appeared to explain the hostile media effect.

Predicting Pluralistic Ignorance: The Hostile Media Perception and its Consequences

This study focused on media coverage of a controversial issue—the use of primates in laboratory research—to examine pluralistic ignorance, the potential for public misjudgment of public opinion. We

Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence

People who hold strong opinions on complex social issues are likely to examine relevant empirical evidence in a biased manner. They are apt to accept "confirming" evidence at face value while

Elaboration of the Hostile Media Phenomenon

TLDR
Results suggest that value-relevant involvement, rather than outcome- relevant involvement, is a critical predictor of HMP in the context of news coverage of the National Security Law in Korea, and was a significant predictor of congruency of presumed media influence, which predicted perceived opinion climate.

Ego-Involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage

Two experiments explored the interface between ego-involvement and the third person effect. In Experiment 1, 34 pro-Israeli, 34 pro-Palestinian, and 34 nonpartisan control-group subjects viewed

Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion.

TLDR
Results supported the hypothesis that people make inferences about the climate of opinion based on their reading of the news, especially the perceived slant of that news, and confirmed that partisans on each side of the issue judged news articles to be biased in a disagreeable direction relative to judgments of those on the other side.