Assigning Cases to Groups Using Taxometric Results

@article{Ruscio2009AssigningCT,
  title={Assigning Cases to Groups Using Taxometric Results},
  author={John Ruscio},
  journal={Assessment},
  year={2009},
  volume={16},
  pages={55 - 70}
}
  • J. Ruscio
  • Published 1 March 2009
  • Environmental Science
  • Assessment
Determining whether individuals belong to different latent classes (taxa) or vary along one or more latent factors (dimensions) has implications for assessment. For example, no instrument can simultaneously maximize the efficiency of categorical and continuous measurement. Methods such as taxometric analysis can test the relative fit of taxonic and dimensional models, but it is not clear how best to assign individuals to groups using taxometric results. The present study compares the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure.
TLDR
It is concluded that the taxometric method may be an effective approach to distinguishing between dimensional and categorical structure but that other latent modeling procedures may be more effective for specifying the model.
Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: a Monte Carlo analysis.
TLDR
It is concluded that using the simulated data curve approach and averaging across procedures is an effective way of distinguishing between dimensional (1-class) and categorical (2 or more classes) latent structure.
Differentiating categorical and dimensional data with taxometric analysis: are two variables better than none?
TLDR
As long as high-quality data are available, it appears that one can have confidence in the results of taxometric analyses performed with only 2 variables, and the potential utility of 2- variables is illustrated using data on proactive and reactive childhood aggression.
Latent Class Detection and Class Assignment: A Comparison of the MAXEIG Taxometric Procedure and Factor Mixture Modeling Approaches
  • G. Lubke, S. Tueller
  • Psychology
    Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal
  • 2010
TLDR
FMM generally outperformed MAXEIG in terms of class detection and class assignment, and Substantially different class sizes negatively impacted the performance of both approaches, whereas low class separation was much more problematic for MAXEig than for the FMM.
To sum or not to sum: taxometric analysis with ordered categorical assessment items.
TLDR
A Monte Carlo study compared the accuracy of taxomet analyses implemented in the traditional way (without summing items) and taxometric analyses implemented with the summed-input method, which substantially reduced discriminating power for 2 of the 3 procedures studied.
Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.
TLDR
An approach to consistency testing is presented that builds on prior work demonstrating that parallel analyses of categorical and dimensional comparison data provide an accurate index of the relative fit of competing structural models.
Using comparison data to differentiate categorical and dimensional data by examining factor score distributions: resolving the mode problem.
TLDR
Performing parallel analyses of categorical and dimensional comparison data and calculating an index of the relative fit of these competing structural models achieves much greater accuracy, improved base rate estimation, and afforded consistency checks with other taxometric procedures.
Group membership prediction when known groups consist of unknown subgroups: a Monte Carlo comparison of methods
TLDR
Results of the study indicated that CART and mixture discriminant analysis were the most effective tools for situations in which known groups were not homogeneous, whereas LDA, LR, and GAM had the highest rates of misclassification.
RTaxometrics : An R Package for Taxometric Analysis
TLDR
The RTaxometrics package provides more user-friendly output and incorporates a recent development known as a CCFI profile that can rigorously test the structure of the data and, if it appears to be categorical, provide an estimate of the taxon base rate.
Using the Comparison Curve Fix Index (CCFI) in Taxometric Analyses: Averaging Curves, Standard Errors, and CCFI Profiles
TLDR
A series of simulation studies examine the use of the CCFI to flesh out some empirically supported guidelines and find that constructing a CCFI profile can help to differentiate categorical and dimensional data and provide a less biased and more precise estimate of the taxon base rate than conventional methods.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
A comparison of maximum covariance and K-means cluster analysis in classifying cases into known taxon groups.
TLDR
In the present Monte Carlo study, the classification efficiencies of MAXCOV and the k-means algorithm were compared across ranges of sample size, effect size, indicator number, taxon base rate, and within-groups covariance and it was found that when the impact of these parameters was minimized, k-Means classified more data points correctly thanMAXCOV.
Taxometric Analysis: II. Detecting Taxonicity Using Covariance of Two Quantitative Indicators in Successive Intervals of a Third Indicator (Maxcov Procedure)
TLDR
Given three quantitative indicators of a conjectured latent taxon, a statistical function defined as the covariance of two indicators computed within successive intervals along the third indicator reveals whether the latent structure of the data is taxonic or not.
Taxometric analysis. I: Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure)
TLDR
Given two quantitative indicators of a conjectured latent taxon, a statistical function defined as the difference between the observed means for cases of one indicator falling above and below a sliding cut indicates whether the latent structure is taxonic or nontaxonic.
A Nontechnical Introduction to the Taxometric Method
TLDR
A nontechnical introduction to the taxometric method for assessing latent structure and a number of refinements and extensions to taxometric methodology including a useful interpretive aid based on the parallel analysis of simulated taxonic and dimensional comparison data.
Taxometric Analysis
Whether individual differences are treated as categorical or continuous has consequences for theory, assessment, classification, and research in criminal justice. Paul Meehl's (1995) taxometric
Applying the Bootstrap to Taxometric Analysis: Generating Empirical Sampling Distributions to Help Interpret Results
TLDR
It is shown that iterative algorithms for creating bootstrap samples of taxonic and dimensional comparison data that reproduce important features of the research data with good precision and negligible bias can be used as an interpretive aid in taxometric research.
The Maxslope Taxometric Procedure: Mathematical Derivation, Parameter Estimation, Consistency Tests
  • W. Grove
  • Mathematics
    Psychological reports
  • 2004
TLDR
Concepts in taxometrics are explained, including the meaning of “taxon” in relation to taxometric procedures, and the MAXSLOPE procedure of Grove and Meehl is mathematically developed which relies on nonlinear regression of one taxometric indicator variable on another.
Bootstraps taxometrics. Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.
  • P. Meehl
  • Psychology
    The American psychologist
  • 1995
TLDR
Two taxometric procedures, MAMBAC and MAXCOV-HITMAX, provide independent tests of the taxonic conjecture and satisfactorily accurate estimates of theTaxon base rate, the latent means, and the valid and false-positive rates achievable by various cuts.
A Structure-Based Approach to Psychological Assessment
TLDR
The present article sets forth the argument that psychological assessment should be based on a construct’s latent structure and outlines a structure-based approach to assessment that builds on dimensional scaling models, such as item response theory, while incorporating classification methods as appropriate.
...
1
2
3
...