Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.

@article{MacDonald2010AssessmentOT,
  title={Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.},
  author={Susan L MacDonald and Steven E. Canfield and Susan F Fesperman and Philipp Dahm},
  journal={The Journal of urology},
  year={2010},
  volume={184 2},
  pages={648-53}
}
PURPOSE Well done systematic reviews provide the highest quality evidence for clinical questions of therapeutic effectiveness. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews in the urological literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically investigated all systematic reviews published in 4 major urological journals from 1998 to 2008. Studies were identified using a predefined search strategy in PubMed and confirmed by a hand search of journal tables of contents. A validated… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 extracted citations

The Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on the Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Cancer Pain Management.

Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses • 2015
View 3 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…