Assessing the cost of early intervention in psychosis: A systematic review

@article{Amos2012AssessingTC,
  title={Assessing the cost of early intervention in psychosis: A systematic review},
  author={Andrew James Amos},
  journal={Australian \& New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry},
  year={2012},
  volume={46},
  pages={719 - 734}
}
  • A. Amos
  • Published 13 June 2012
  • Medicine, Psychology, Political Science
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Objective: Early-intervention units have proliferated over the last decade, justified in terms of cost as well as treatment effect. Strong claims for extension of these programmes on economic grounds motivate a systematic review of economic evaluations of early-intervention programmes. Method: Searches were undertaken in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO with keywords including ‘early intervention’, ‘ultra-high risk’, ‘prodrome’, ‘cost… 

Tables from this paper

Cost-effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis: systematic review
TLDR
There is consistent evidence that the implementation of EIP services might be a cost-effective alternative across different health systems, nevertheless, such evidence derives from heterogeneous and sometimes methodologically flawed studies, reducing the certainty of such statement.
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Psychological Therapies for Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review
TLDR
Most studies concluded psychological interventions for schizophrenia/BD are cost-effective, including CBT, although there was notable uncertainty.
Author's reply
TLDR
Aceituno et al’s systematic review of economic evaluations of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) is an example of the use of spin to misrepresent advantages of EIP, with the failure to identify limitations of specific articles leading to wildly optimistic conclusions.
The costs of early intervention in psychosis: Restoring the balance
TLDR
A review of studies evaluating economic aspects of EIP services is concerned that this particular review has fallen short in terms of fairness, balance and, above all, factual accuracy.
Need for evidence-based early intervention programmes: a public health perspective
TLDR
Given the pitfalls of the narrow focus of the UHR/CHR framework, a broader prevention strategy embracing pluripotency of early psychopathology seems to serve as a better alternative, Nevertheless, there is a need for economic evaluation of these extended transdiagnostic early intervention programmes.
Counting the cost: Commentary on a systematic review of cost of early intervention in psychosis
  • V. Carr
  • Psychology
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
  • 2012
TLDR
Developing and evaluating interventions for individuals with psychotic disorders designed to reduce the impact of community-based exclusion are important, but social interventions to reduced the likelihood of such exclusion are also important and challenging.
Unsystematic review shows neither that early intervention in psychosis is cost-effective nor cost-minimising
  • A. Amos
  • Psychology, Medicine
    British Journal of Psychiatry
  • 2019
TLDR
Aceituno et al's systematic review of economic evaluations of early intervention in psychosis (EIP) is an example of the use of spin to misrepresent advantages of EIP, leading to wildly optimistic conclusions.
[Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, current knowledge and future directions].
TLDR
The status of the early intervention movement (in terms of availability and policy) in Western public healthcare systems can be resolved into a spectrum and the United Kingdom is shown to be the leader while Canada appears at the middle of the spectrum.
Universal Mental Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations
TLDR
There is some evidence based on decision-analytic modelling that anti-bullying interventions represent value for money, but a lack of studies that take into account long-term costs and effects limits the possibility of drawing strong conclusions about cost effectiveness.
Do early intervention for psychosis services really save money?
  • Anthony F Jorm
  • Psychology, Medicine
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
  • 2013
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 47(4) References De Leon J, Verghese C, Tracy JI, et al. (1994) Polydipsia and water intoxication in psychiatric patients: a review of the
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES
Cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service for people with psychosis
TLDR
Early intervention did not increase costs and was highly likely to be cost- effective when compared with standard care, and when costs were combined with improved vocational and quality of life outcomes it was shown that early intervention would have a very high likelihood of being cost-effective.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF EARLY INTERVENTION IN PEOPLE AT HIGH RISK OF PSYCHOSIS
TLDR
This model suggests that services that permit early detection of people at high risk of psychosis may be cost saving.
Early intervention for psychosis.
TLDR
Evaluating the effects of early detection, phase-specific treatments, and specialised early intervention teams in the treatment of people with prodromal symptoms or first episode psychosis and how far they are underpinned by evidence of effectiveness is unclear.
The Lambeth Early Onset (LEO) Team: randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of specialised care for early psychosis
TLDR
Limited evidence shows that a team delivering specialised care for patients with early psychosis is superior to standard care for maintaining contact with professionals and for reducing readmissions to hospital.
Effect of early intervention on 5-year outcome in non-affective psychosis
TLDR
Findings that specialist intervention did not markedly improved outcome at 5 years accord with those from a larger OPUS study and should be generalised with caution.
The socio-economical burden of schizophrenia: A simulation of cost-offset of early intervention program in Italy
Is early intervention for psychosis a waste of valuable resources?
The concept of early intervention for psychosis has received much attention in recent years. The experience of pioneer services in the USA and Australia has convinced the UK Government to set aside
Early intervention in schizophrenia patients--rationale for its implementation and practice.
  • E. Chen
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi
  • 1999
TLDR
This review examines the clinical and theoretical evidence justifying early intervention in individuals with schizophrenia, and suggests that early intervention programmes should try to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis.
Cost-Effectiveness of An Early Assessment Service for Young People with Early Psychosis in Hong Kong
TLDR
EASY is likely to be more cost-effective in improving outcomes, particularly in reducing hospitalization and improving clinical symptoms among young people with first episode psychosis, according to the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.
...
...