Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach

  title={Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach},
  author={Yuval Shany},
  journal={American Journal of International Law},
  pages={225 - 270}
  • Y. Shany
  • Published 1 April 2012
  • Political Science
  • American Journal of International Law
During the last twenty years, the world has experienced a sharp rise in the number of international courts and tribunals, and a correlative expansion of their jurisdictions. These occurrences have dramatically affected and will continue to affect the fields of international law and international relations. The creation and operation of international judicial bodies that are capable of enforcing international commitments, interpreting international treaties, and settling international conflicts… 

On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority

Abstract This contribution presents international judicial institutions as multifunctional actors against the background of a traditional understanding, which sees just one function: settling

Aspiring States

International law is arguably no longer dominated by a state-centric approach. Non-state actors, such as international organizations, NGOs, or multi-national corporations, play a significant role in

Generalising the Principle of Complementarity: Framing International Judicial Authority

Abstract International courts exercise public authority. Their decisions affect individual and collective self-determination. Nowadays, international courts decide on criminal, constitutional and

The Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice

Instead, the research group proposed to evaluate judicial effectiveness on the basis of a goal-based approach that was developed from organizational studies in sociology positing that an effective

The Effectiveness of International Adjudicators

This chapter, forthcoming in the Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, provides an analytical overview of the burgeoning literature on the effectiveness of international courts and tribunals

Authority and Legitimacy of Environmental Post-Treaty Rules

A vast and complex web of environmental ‘post-treaty rules’ (PTRs) has become central to developing international environmental governance. These PTRs include resolutions, recommendations, decisions,

Trial and Error in International Judicialization

The “standard narrative of international judicialization” is a largely linear story of successes from nineteenth-century arbitration to the current constellation of adjudicative bodies. The stars of

Uses of IHL by the International Court of Justice: A Critical Approach Towards Its Role in the International Legal Arena

The function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is to decide in accordance with international law such disputes or advisory opinions that are submitted to it. Although the ICJ has

Negotiating Civil War

Civil war has been a fact of political life throughout recorded history. However, unlike inter-state wars, international law has not traditionally regulated such conflicts. How then can we explain

International reports as trumps in international litigation: recent judgment of the European court of human rights in the Georgia v. Russia (I) case

The recent European Court of Human Right's judgment Georgia v. Russia (I) allows to explore whether an international court judgment's credibility can be satisfactorily explained via legal methodology



No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary

The article assesses some of the theoretical and practical implications arising out of some recent changes in the field of international dispute settlement: the rise in the number of international

Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts

At the end of the nineteenth century, the international community began creating its first tribunals with the establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Since then, numerous courts and

Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court

Over the past few decades, regional human rights tribunals have grown in both number and activity. The European Court of Human Rights (European Court or ECHR) now receives tens of thousands of

Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law

This Article examines the tension between the demonstrable need for structured international cooperation in a world of interdependence and the political strain that arises whenever policymaking

On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law

This article focuses on the problems of, and prospects for, the enforcement of international humanitarian law through the prosecution and punishment of individuals accused of violations of

Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters

The conceptual, and more recently empirical, study of compliance has become a central preoccupation, and perhaps the fastest growing sub-field, in international legal scholarship. The authors seek to

Less as More: Rethinking Supranational Litigation of Economic and Social Rights in the Americas

Over the last few decades, scholars and activists have attacked the conceptual division of human rights into justiciable civil and political rights on the one hand, and largely non-justiciable

Locking in Democracy: Constitutions, Commitment, and International Law

National constitutions exhibit a wide variety of approaches to international law. Some constitutions provide that customary international law is directly incorporated into the constitutional order,

Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo

A recent article in the California Law Review by Professors Eric Posner and John Yoo, Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, argues that the only effective international tribunals are

Judging History: The Historical Record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Scholars and legal officials have argued that courts should not attempt to write definitive historical accounts of mass human rights violations. Even if a court seeks to reconstruct a comprehensive