Assessing Veteran Symptom Validity

@article{Russo2014AssessingVS,
  title={Assessing Veteran Symptom Validity},
  author={Arthur C. Russo},
  journal={Psychological Injury and Law},
  year={2014},
  volume={7},
  pages={178-190}
}
  • A. Russo
  • Published 5 March 2014
  • Psychology
  • Psychological Injury and Law
The accurate assessment of veteran symptom validity is a type of disciplined and reasoned inquiry towards the truth. This inquiry includes a two-part recognition (1) that assessing veteran truthfulness is properly part of accurately assessing veteran symptoms and (2) that the institutional environment must allow such inquiries to proceed unimpeded. This article identifies the institutional and veteran-based threats to the accurate assessment of veteran truthfulness, with suggestions on managing… 

Towards Balanced VA and SSA Policies in Psychological Injury Disability Assessment

The area of forensic disability and related assessments requires comprehensive assessments that are scientifically-informed and impartial. This is especially true for disability assessments at public

Patterns of MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scale scores observed across Veteran Affairs settings.

TLDR
Examination of frequencies of protocol invalidity based on the MMPI-2-RF's validity scales provides comprehensive descriptive findings on validity scale scores within the VA and implications for practice and the utility of the M MPI- 2-RF within theVA are discussed.

Feigning Screeners in VA PTSD Compensation and Pension Examinations

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) occurs at relatively high rates among individuals involved in military combat and captivity. In 2010, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) instituted a

Core Competencies in VA Compensation and Pension Exams for PTSD and Other Mental Disorders

The concept of core competencies has in recent years seen a rising interest as the mental health field has increasingly focused on empirically validated approaches to assessment and intervention. VA

Malingering in Forensic Disability-Related Assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15 %

Psychological injuries concern conditions produced by negligent actions, such as in motor vehicle accidents, and that result in claims for damages, such as in tort. In the psychological injury

Dissemination or dialogue?

  • L. Greene
  • Psychology
    The American psychologist
  • 2014
TLDR
Comments on the article by B. E. Karlin and G. Cross on the national dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system suggest dialogue between therapist and researcher rather than unidirectional, top-down dissemination may be a more fruitful way of dealing with the resistances, reluctances, and refusals that clinicians often demonstrate regarding the implementation of laboratory-based treatments.

Consistency of Self-Reported Neurocognitive Symptoms, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, and Concussive Events From End of First Deployment to Veteran Health Administration Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation by Operations Enduring Freedom/Iraqi Freedom/New Dawn Veterans

  • A. RussoEsther C. Fingerhut
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists
  • 2017
TLDR
Questions regarding the accuracy of veteran self-report of both near and distant traumatic events are raised, and the inclusion of contemporaneous Department of Defense records in veteran assessment and treatment planning is argued for.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 74 REFERENCES

Military Service Records: Searching for the Truth

In conducting Compensation and Pension (C&P) examinations, one of the most significant sources of evidence supporting a veteran’s claim for service connection are found in the veteran’s service

What Tests Are Acceptable for Use in Forensic Evaluations? A Survey of Experts

When conducting a forensic evaluation, what psychological tests do experts consider acceptable to use? The answer is useful to psychologists making practice decisions but also to the courts, who rely

Ethical, Legal and Risk Management Considerations in the Neuropsychological Assessment of Veterans

TLDR
The article uses a top-down structure, with each section identifying the relevant core biomedical ethical principles followed by an elaboration of the relevant ethical requirements as defined by the American Psychological Association’s Code of Ethics.

Use of the SIRS in Compensation Cases: An Examination of Its Validity and Generalizability

TLDR
Comparisons were performed based on common disorders, presence of a cognitive disorder (dementia, amnestic disorder, or cognitive disorder NOS), or intellectual deficits, providing evidence of the SIRS generalizability across these diagnostic categories.

A Case of Malingering by Proxy in a Social Security Disability Psychological Consultative Examination

TLDR
This case shows a practical application of a symptom validity scale for low-functioning individuals (Chafetz, Abrahams, & Kohlmaier, 2007), which was designed initially for use with adult and child SSD claimants.

Detection of Feigned Mental Disorders

TLDR
The data supported the F as an effective scale but questioned the routine use of Fb, and among the specialized scales, Ds appeared especially useful because of its sophisticated strategy, consistent cut score, and minimal false-positives.

Evaluating the gold standard: a review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.

TLDR
Examining 26 studies using the SIRS to identify feigning revealed that research published since the initial validation studies demonstrate higher sensitivity but lower specificity rates than those reported in the SirS manual.

Mind Reading and the Art of Drafting Medical Opinions in Veterans Benefits Claims

TLDR
The purpose of this article is to assist those involved in VA’s currently sub-optimal evidence gathering system in producing better results under the current regime.

Symptom Validity Testing: A Critical Review

TLDR
A number of methodological and theoretical weaknesses of SVT research which limit the use of SVTs as clinical tools and sources of evidence are highlighted and recommendations must be addressed if conclusions based on SVT data are to meet the increasingly rigorous standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence.

Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment

  • G. Larrabee
  • Psychology
    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • 2012
TLDR
It is shown that false positive errors decrease, with a corresponding increase in the positive probability of malingering, when multiple independent indicators are required for diagnosis, and the rigor of PVT and SVT research design is related to a high degree of reproducibility of results, and large effect sizes of d=1.0 or greater.
...