Assessing Measurement Properties of Two Single-item General Health Measures

Abstract

Background: Multi-item health status measures can be lengthy, expensive, and burdensome to collect. Single-item measures may be an alternative. We compared measurement properties of two single-item, general self-rated health (GSRH) questions to assess how well they captured information in a validated, multi-item instrument. Methods: We administered a general health survey (SF-12V) that included “standard” and “comparative” forms of a GSRH. We repeated the survey two weeks later to the same 75 medically stable outpatients to test for GSRH reproducibility, reliability, and validity using SF-12V Physical Functioning and Emotional Health subscales as a reference. Results: At each survey administration, the two GSRH questions demonstrated good alternate forms reliability (first administration: r=0.74, p<0.001; second administration: r=0.74, p<0.001) and good reproducibility (“standard”: ICC 0.69; “comparative”: ICC 0.85). Both GSRH items correlated with physical functioning (“standard”: r=0.66; “comparative”: r=0.56) and emotional health measures (“standard”: r=0.65; “comparative”: r=0.59). Mean subscale measures associated with responses in each GSRH category were significantly different (ANOVA, p<0.001), indicating strong discriminant scale performance. Conclusions: Our single-item, GSRH questions demonstrated good reproducibility, reliability, and strong concurrent and discriminant scale performance with an established health status measure.

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-0887-2

4 Figures and Tables

0204060'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

238 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 238 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Desalvo2005AssessingMP, title={Assessing Measurement Properties of Two Single-item General Health Measures}, author={Karen B Desalvo and William P. Fisher and Ky Tran and Nicole Bloser and William Merrill and John Peabody}, journal={Quality of Life Research}, year={2005}, volume={15}, pages={191-201} }