Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis

@article{Khoo2019ArticlePC,
  title={Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis},
  author={Shaun Yon-Seng Khoo},
  journal={LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries},
  year={2019}
}
  • S. Khoo
  • Published 9 May 2019
  • Economics
  • LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries
Open access publishing has frequently been proposed as a solution to the serials crisis, which involved unsustainable budgetary pressures on libraries due to hyperinflation of subscription costs. The majority of open access articles are published in a minority of journals that levy article processing charges (APCs) paid by authors or their institutions upon acceptance. Increases in APCs is proceeding at a rate three times that which would be expected if APCs were indexed according to inflation… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Three new suggested guidelines for increased transparency regarding open access article processing charges (APCs)

The article processing charge (APC) lies at the heart of the gold open access (GOA) business model. Small and larger society-based, as well as commercial publishers, rely – to different extents – on

The oligopoly’s shift to open access publishing

This study estimates fees paid for gold and hybrid open access articles in journals published by the oligopoly of academic publishers, which acknowledge funding from the Canadian Tri-Agency. It

Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions

It is widely accepted that science is universal by nature. However, to make science universal, access to research findings is imperative. The open access model of publication of academic articles was

Investigating the article processing charge of journals in the gold open access market: A game theory approach

As a promising solution for enhancing knowledge communication as well as alleviating financial pressure of institutional libraries, gold open access (gold OA) has attracted wide attention all over

Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals

  • S. Asai
  • Business
    Information Discovery and Delivery
  • 2022
Purpose While the number of hybrid journals has increased with the conversion from subscription journals, article processing charges (APCs) have not been examined as frequently as gold open access

Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in Biology

It is suggested that, in most cases, paying for access does confer a citation advantage, and authors with limited budgets should pursue open access alternatives that do not require paying a fee as they still yielded more citations than closed access.

Strategies to Increase the Number of Open Access Journals: The Cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature

  • S. Asai
  • Engineering
    Journal of Scholarly Publishing
  • 2022
Abstract:In recent years, major commercial publishers have strengthened their presence in both the subscription journal market and the open access journal market. Examining 447 journals from Elsevier

An analysis of revising article processing charges for open access journals between 2018 and 2020

Examination of APC changes for 231 open access journals independently launched by two large publishers reveals that BMC raised the APCs for journals with higher citation scores, while Hindawi did not consider citation score as a factor in revising charges.

Article Processing Charges based publications: to which extent the price explains scientific impact?

The present study aims to analyze relationship between Citations Normalized Score (NCS) of scientific publications and Article Processing Charges (APCs) amounts of Gold Open access publications. To

Article processing charges, altmetrics and citation impact: Is there an economic rationale?

Results show that contrary to common belief, paying high APCs does not necessarily increase the impact of publications, and the "number of readers" indicator is more effective as it is more correlated with classic bibliometrics indicators than the Altmetrics score.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES

Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality

A systematic survey of prices charged by Open Access journals indexed in Scopus revealed a moderate correlation between the APCs and Source Normalized Impact per Paper values, a measure of citation rates, which would seem to indicate that while publishers to some extent take the quality into account when pricing their journals, authors are even more sensitive to the relationship between price and quality in their choices of where to submit their manuscripts.

A Very Long Embargo: Journal Choice Reveals Active Non-Compliance with Funder Open Access Policies by Australian and Canadian Neuroscientists

It is found that the implementation of Australian and Canadian funder open access policies in 2012/2013 and 2015 did not reduce the number of publications in non-compliant journals, and scientific output in all publication types increased with the greatest growth in immediate open access journals.

Open access mythbusting: Testing two prevailing assumptions about the effects of open access adoption

This article looks at whether there is evidence to support two prevailing assumptions about open access (OA) by combining citation‐based impact scores with data from publishers’ price lists, and found no evidence suggesting that OA journals suffer significant quality issues compared with non‐OA journals.

From closed to open access: A case study of flipped journals

It is concluded that flipping to open access can improve the performance of journals, despite decreasing the tendency of authors to submit their articles and no better citation advantages for articles.

Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison

13 evidence-based characteristics by which predatory journals may potentially be distinguished from presumed legitimate journals are identified may be useful for authors who are assessing journals for possible submission or for others, such as universities evaluating candidates’ publications as part of the hiring process.

Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure

OA journal publishing is disrupting the dominant subscription-based model of scientific publishing, having rapidly grown in relative annual share of published journal articles during the last decade.

Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?

It is found that elite journals with very low acceptance rates have far fewer articles with no or few citations, but that the long tail of articles with two citations or less was actually bigger in a sample of selective traditional journals in comparison with megajournals.

Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications

This paper proposes using the principles of digital transformation to reinvent publishing as a two‐step process where articles are published first as preprints, and then, journal editors invite authors to submit only papers that ‘succeed’ to peer review, which would reduce costs significantly, opening a sustainable pathway for scholarly publishing and OA.

Germany seeks 'big flip' in publishing model.

Germany’s consortium of libraries, universities, and research institutes wants to pay publishers an annual lump sum that covers publication costs of all papers whose first authors are at German institutions, which could help trigger what some call a “big flip,” a global transition toward open access.