Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Minimum Two Year Clinical Outcomes

@inproceedings{Werner2014ArthroscopicSA,
  title={Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Minimum Two Year Clinical Outcomes},
  author={Brian C Werner and Cody L. Evans and Russell E Holzgrefe and Matthew Lawrence Lyons and Joseph M. Hart and Eric Carson and David R. Diduch and M. Dawn Miller and Stephen F. Brockmeier},
  booktitle={The American journal of sports medicine},
  year={2014}
}
BACKGROUND While a vast body of literature exists describing biceps tenodesis techniques and evaluating the biomechanical aspects of tenodesis locations or various implants, little literature presents useful clinical outcomes to guide surgeons in their decision to perform a particular method of tenodesis. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS To compare the clinical outcomes of open subpectoral biceps tenodesis (OSPBT) and arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT). Our null hypothesis was that both… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 24 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…