Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information

  title={Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information},
  author={J. Berger},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  pages={891 - 893}
  • J. Berger
  • Published 2011
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Psychological Science
  • Social transmission is everywhere. Friends talk about restaurants, policy wonks rant about legislation, analysts trade stock tips, neighbors gossip, and teens chitchat. Further, such interpersonal communication affects everything from decision making and well-being (Asch, 1956; Mehl, Vazire, Holleran, & Clark, 2010) to the spread of ideas, the persistence of stereotypes, and the diffusion of culture (Heath, 1996; Heath, Bell, & Sternberg, 2001; Kashima, 2008; Schaller, Conway, & Tanchuk, 2002… CONTINUE READING

    Figures and Topics from this paper.

    Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research
    • 548
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    What Makes Online Content Viral?
    • 999
    • PDF
    Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share
    • 147
    Quantifying the Effect of Sentiment on Information Diffusion in Social Media
    • 86
    • PDF
    Beyond Viral: Interpersonal Communication in the Internet Age
    • 27
    • PDF
    Misinformation and Its Correction
    • 697
    • PDF
    Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews
    • 343
    • PDF


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review
    • 670
    Rumor in the Marketplace: The Social Psychology of Commercial Hearsay
    • 71
    Do People Prefer to Pass Along Good or Bad News? Valence and Relevance of News as Predictors of Transmission Propensity
    • Heath
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • 1996
    • 106
    • PDF
    Emotion elicitation using films
    • 2,100
    • PDF
    Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends.
    • 421
    • PDF
    Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.
    • 3,149
    • PDF