Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion

@article{Corcilius2013AristotlesMO,
  title={Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion},
  author={Klaus Corcilius and Pavel Gregori{\'c}},
  journal={Phronesis},
  year={2013},
  volume={58},
  pages={52-97}
}
Abstract In this paper we argue that Aristotle operates with a particular theoretical model in his explanation of animal locomotion, what we call the ‘centralized incoming and outgoing motions’ (CIOM) model. We show how the model accommodates more complex cases of animal motion and how it allows Aristotle to preserve the intuition that animals are self-movers, without jeopardizing his arguments for the eternity of motion and the necessary existence of one eternal unmoved mover in Physics VIII… 
Desire and cognition in Aristotle’s theory of the voluntary movements of animal locomotion
Two of the main controversies that have occupied specialists who dedicate themselves to the study of Aristotle’s theory of animal locomotion are the controversy about the form of the cognition
Aristotle on Self-Change in Plants
Abstract A lot of scholarly attention has been given to Aristotle’s account of how and why animals are capable of moving themselves. But no one has focused on the question, whether self-change is
Aristotle on Motion in Incomplete Animals
Abstract I explain what Aristotle means when, after puzzling about the matter of motion in incomplete animals (those without sight, smell, hearing), he suggests in De Anima III 11.433b31–434a5 that
Aristotle’s Physiology of Animal Motion: On Neura and Muscles
Abstract Aristotle had a developed theory of animal motion with an elaborate physiological component. In this paper we present the physiological component in which the main role is assigned to
Aristotle on Perceptual Interests
Abstract Traditional interpretations of Aristotle’s theory of perception mainly focus on uncovering the underlying mechanisms that are at stake when perceivers are affected by sensible qualities.
Activity, Passivity, and Perceptual Discrimination in Aristotle
This paper offers a new interpretation of Aristotle’s account of basic perceptual discrimination in On the Soul II 11. This is the discrimination of single perceptible qualities like, e.g., ‘red’,
Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Active Intellectual Cognition
Since Antiquity, “active cognition” has been a problematic notion in Aristotelian scholarship. Part of the problem is the definition of what counts as “active”. In the first part of this paper I
Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Common Sense
In this paper I argue that Alexander, while being generally faithful to Aristotle’s regarding the common sense, made four lasting contributions to this topic. First, he restricted the term ‘common
Aristotle on Attention
Abstract I argue that a study of the Nicomachean Ethics and of the Parva Naturalia shows that Aristotle had a notion of attention. This notion captures the common aspects of apparently different
Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error
Aristotle sometimes claims that (i) the perception of special perceptibles by their proper sense is unerring. This claim is striking, since it might seem that we quite often misperceive things like
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
The Soul and Its Instrumental Body: A Reinterpretation of Aristotle's Philosophy of Living Nature
Introduction 1. Aristotle's psychology reconsidered 2. The modern debate on Aristotle's psychology 3. Pneuma as the organon of the soul in De motu animalium 4. What body is suitable for receiving the
'Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics': Aristotle???s definition of non-rational pleasure and pain and desire
“And what is natural is pleasant; and all pursue their natural pleasure.” (Aristotle, Historia Animalium ix .1, 589a8–9, trans. D. M. Balme) Aristotle thinks that it is not enough for us to simply
Conceptualized and Unconceptualized Desire in Aristotle
L'A. etudie la conception du desir chez Aristote defini comme une categorie de la cognition predicative. L'A. montre que la distinction entre la perception des sens et la pensee, au sein de la
Imagination humaine et imagination animale chez Aristote
Une certaine tradition, grossi6rement, celle de la "metaphysique occidentale", s'organise autour de la difference entre l'homme et l'animal: la parole humaine temoignerait de la nature raisonnable de
Self-Movers
  • Aristotle on the Mind and on the Senses
  • 1978
Desire and the Good
Heart and soul.
  • S. Wright
  • Sociology, Medicine
    Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
  • 2008
Streben und Bewegen: Aristoteles
  • Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewe-
  • 2008
...
1
2
3
4
...