Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases

@inproceedings{Benferhat1993ArgumentativeII,
  title={Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases},
  author={Salem Benferhat and Didier Dubois and Henri Prade},
  booktitle={UAI},
  year={1993}
}
This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argumentative-consequence relation, taking into account the existence of consistent arguments in favor of a conclusion and the absence of consistent arguments in favor of its contrary, is particularly investigated. Flat knowledge bases, i.e. without any priority between their elements, as well as prioritized ones where some elements are considered as more strongly entrenched than… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 106 extracted citations

Signed Systems for Paraconsistent Reasoning

Journal of Automated Reasoning • 1998
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks

Journal of Automated Reasoning • 2002
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 24 references

On inference from inconsistent premises

N. Resher, R. Manor
Theory and Decision, • 1970
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Combining knowledge bases consisting in first order theories

C. Baral, S. Kraus, V.S.J. Minker
Subrahmanian • 1992
View 2 Excerpts

Inconsistency in possibilistic knowledge bases — To live or not live with it. In: Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty (L.A

D. Dubois, J. Lang, H. Prade
1992
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…