Argumentation as/in/for dialogical relation: a case study from elementary school science

  title={Argumentation as/in/for dialogical relation: a case study from elementary school science},
  author={Mijung Kim and Wolff-Michael Roth},
  journal={Pedagogies: An International Journal},
  pages={300 - 321}
Argumentation as a form of introducing children to science has received increasing attention over the past decade. Argumentation tends to be studied and theorized through the lens of individual speakers, who contribute to a conversation by means of opposing statements. M.M. Bakhtin and L.S. Vygotsky independently proposed a very different approach by suggesting that dialogical relations inherently and irreducibly embody argumentation. From this position, dialogical relations allow children to… Expand
11 Citations
Dialogical argumentation in elementary science classrooms
To understand students’ argumentation abilities, there have been practices that focus on counting and analyzing argumentation schemes such as claim, evidence, warrant, backing, and rebuttal. ThisExpand
Dialogical argumentation in second- and third-grade science classrooms
The current practice of teaching argumentation focuses on mastering the structure of argumentation schemes such as claim, evidence, warrant, and conclusion. However, this approach lacks the dynamicsExpand
Emergence of Argumentation in Elementary Students’ Science Learning
In the field of science education, argumentation has been supported as a core practice for scientific literacy. Although studies on student argumentation have exploded in recent years, research onExpand
Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing
Why do we formulate arguments? Usually, things such as persuading opponents, finding consensus, and justifying knowledge are listed as functions of arguments. But arguments can also be used toExpand
Meaning and the real life of language—Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms
Abstract In this study, a contribution to the nature of language and its implication for linguistics in education, I take up Vygotskij's (1934) and Volosinov's (1930) discussion of an episode fromExpand
Heeding Wittgenstein on “Understanding” and “Meaning”: A Pragmatist and Concrete Human Psychological Approach in/for Education
Over 60 years ago, the influential language philosopher L. Wittgenstein suggested that there is no need to use "understanding" and "meaning" to understand how language works and, in fact, that theExpand
The theory of knowledge objectification, initially presented and developed by Luis Radford, has gained some traction in the field of mathematics education. As with any developing theory, itsExpand
Scientific Practices as an Actor-Network of Literacy Events: Forging a Convergence Between Disciplinary Literacy and Scientific Practices
Researchers working in the intersection of literacy and science education have increasingly acknowledged and emphasised the convergence between disciplinary literacy and scientific practices.Expand
The role of green chemistry activities in fostering secondary school students' understanding of acid–base concepts and argumentation skills
In a world where environmental degradation is taking on alarming levels, understanding, and acting to minimize, the individual environmental impact is an important goal for many science educators. InExpand
Organic Chemistry Lectures in Higher Education and Pedagogical Link-Making
The curricula of undergraduate courses have been receiving criticism due to fragmentation of knowledge. In this study, we analyze the use of pedagogical link-making in Higher Education as possibilityExpand


Developing Argumentation: Lessons Learned in the Primary School
In this chapter, I argue three main points: first, that one of the most important aims of education ought to be to develop children’s capability for argumentation; secondly, that teachers can make aExpand
What Students’ Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education
The relationship between teaching and argumentation is becoming a crucial issue in the field of education and, in particular, science education. Teaching has been analyzed as a dialogue aimed atExpand
Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education
Toulmin's model of argumentation, developed in 1958, has guided much argumentation research in education. However, argumentation theory in philosophy and cognitive science has advanced considerablyExpand
Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education
This paper explores the challenges of using the Toulmin model to analyze students’ dialogical argumentation. The paper presents a theoretical exposition of what is involved in an empirical study ofExpand
Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science
Toulmin’s model of argument has been used by researchers as a theoretical perspective on argument and as a methodological tool for analysing episodes of oral argumentation in school science. AnExpand
Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education
Argumentation has become an increasingly recognized focus for science instruction---as a learning process, as an outcome associated with the appropriation of scientific discourse, and as a windowExpand
Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument
What does it take to argue well? The goal of this series of studies was to better understand the cognitive skills entailed in argument, and their course of development, isolated from the verbal andExpand
Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms
Basing its arguments in current perspectives on the nature of the scientific enterprise, which see argument and argumentative practice as a core activity of scientists, this article develops the caseExpand
Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions
Theoretical and empirical research on argument and argumentation in science education has intensified over the last two decades. The term “argument” in this review refers to the artifacts that aExpand
Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview
Charles Darwin once described On the Origin of Species as “one long argument”. This sentence can be viewed as embodying several of the different dimensions of argumentation discussed in this book. OnExpand