Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese

@article{Miyagawa2004ArgumentSA,
  title={Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese},
  author={Shigeru Miyagawa and Takae Tsujioka},
  journal={Journal of East Asian Linguistics},
  year={2004},
  volume={13},
  pages={1-38}
}
Ditransitive verbs such as send and give appear in two distinct structures in English, the double object and the to-dative constructions. It is well known that the two differ semantically and syntactically. In some recent works, it is suggested that the semantic differences observed by Bresnan (1978), Oehrle (1976) and others, and the structural properties noted by Barss and Lasnik (1986), Larson (1988), and others, can both be captured by postulating an extra head for the Double Object… 
The syntax and semantics of dative DPs in Russian ditransitives
TLDR
The interpretative and syntactic differences between scrambled and base generated high datives lead us to claim that in Russian, dative ditransitives have two distinct underlying structures that are not derivationally related.
The Argument Structure of Verbal Alternations in Tamil
An important debate concerning alternations in ditransitive structures is whether the two alternants are derived transformationally from a single argument structure (Larson 1988, Baker 1988) or are
The Semantic Bases of Japanese and Korean Ditransitives
Ditransitive constructions—constructions with three-argument verbs—have received considerable attention in recent years from a typological perspective; the hope is that the study of how a third
Possession and Spatial Motion in the Acquisition of Ditransitives
What is the nature of the relation between a verb and its arguments? In this dissertation, I look to evidence from language acquisition for answers, focusing on a class of constructions commonly used
An Applicative Approach to Major Object Constructions in East Asian Languages
In (1, 2), a monotransitive verb kick appears to take two objects that hold a possessive relation. Sentences like the above are called Major Object Constructions (MOC). I call the possessor, John in
On the syntax of applicative and causative constructions
TLDR
This dissertation investigates the argument structure of verb phrases by identifying the syntactic roles and locations of the functional heads it consists of and shows that the tripartite hypothesis provides a syntactic account of the constraints on applicative and causative affix.
What Does a Verb-Sensitive Approach to Japanese Ditransitive Constructions Tell Us?
This paper examines Japanese ditransitive constructions from a lexical semantic perspective in lines with Kishimoto (2001) and Levin (2010). Ditransitive verbs in Japanese, a head-final language with
Selective learning in the acquisition of Kannada ditransitives
In this article we offer up a particular linguistic phenomenon, quantifier-variable binding in Kannada ditransitives, as a proving ground upon which competing claims about learnability can be
Syntax of Ditransitives-Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics
Ditransitive predicates select for two internal arguments, and hence minimally entail the participation of three entities in the event described by the verb. Canonical ditransitive verbs include
The position of nominative NPs in Japanese: Evidence for nominative NPs in-situ
Abstract This paper presents some new data of the Japanese language, which shows that the nominative NP, particularly the nominative subject, can stay in-situ and that in a certain case, it cannot
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES
The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations
VP Internal Scrambling
In this paper, I argue that the indirect object of a ditransitive verb is always base-generated higher than the direct object. The word order alternation between the arguments in Japanese is the
Some observations on quantifier floating in Japanese
Quantifier Floating (QF) in Japanese has been claimed to be a relational rule (Postal (1976)), non-relational (Shibatani (1977)), or partially relational (Inoue (1978), Kuno (1978)). The necessary
Order in Phrase Structure and Movement
This article proposes the following mechanism of Merge, modifying and incorporating the effect of the head parameter: K = , , , where , a. = : head-initial, left-headed b. = : head-final,
The Mental representation of grammatical relations
The editor of this volume, who is also author or coauthor of five of the contributions, has provided an introduction that not only affords an overview of the separate articles but also interrelates
Object Asymmetries in a Phase Theory of Syntax
TLDR
It is argued that a difference in phase structure can give rise to syntactic, semantic, and phonological differences in the two types of applicatives, which have different lexical semantics.
ON THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION
TLDR
It is proposed that the structure of a double object construction is a basic form and theructure of a dative construction is derived from it by passivization within VP.
Introducing arguments
In her book Introducing Arguments, Linda Pylkkänen distinguishes between the core and noncore arguments of verbs by means of a detailed discussion of applicative and causative constructions. The term
Object Shift and Scrambling
TLDR
It is argued that English has a kind of overt object shift that moves an accusative DP within VP rather than to a VP-external position where its Case is to be checked, and that this 'partial' object shift results from short scrambling, analyzed as optional, non-feature-checking movement.
Competition and disjoint reference
A number of approaches to binding theory have made crucial reference to the notion of competition in explanations of disjoint reference phenomena (see Burzio 1989, 1991, to appear; Richards 1995).
...
1
2
3
4
5
...