• DOI:10.1002/sia.6996
• Corpus ID: 119489058

Argon cluster‐ion sputter yield: Molecular dynamics simulations on silicon and equation for estimating total sputter yield

@article{Cumpson2021ArgonCS,
  title={Argon cluster‐ion sputter yield: Molecular dynamics simulations on silicon and equation for estimating total sputter yield},
  author={Peter Cumpson and Mieszko Jaskiewicz and Woo Kyun Kim},
  journal={Surface and Interface Analysis},
  year={2021},
  volume={54},
  pages={341 - 348}
}

• P. Cumpson, Mieszko Jaskiewicz, Woo Kyun Kim
• Published 1 October 2017
• Physics
• Surface and Interface Analysis

Argon Gas Cluster‐Ion Beam sources have become widely‐used on X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) instruments in recent years, but there is little reference data on sputter yields in the literature as yet. Total sputter yield reference data is needed in order to calibrate the depth scale, of XPS or SIMS depth profiles. We previously published a semi‐empirical ‘Threshold’ equation for estimating cluster total sputter yield from the energy‐per‐atom of the cluster and the effective monatomic sputter threshold of the material. This has been shown to agree extremely well with sputter yield measurements on a range or organic and inorganic materials for clusters of around a thousand atoms. Here we use the molecular dynamics (MD) approach to explore a wider range of energy and cluster size than is easy to do experimentally to high precision. We performed MD simulations using the ‘Large‐scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator’ (LAMMPS) parallel MD code on high‐performance computer (HPC) systems. We performed 1150 simulations of individual collisions with a silicon (100) surface as an archetypal inorganic substrate, for cluster sizes between 30 and 3000 argon atoms and energies in the range 5 to 40 eV per atom. This corresponds to the most important regime for experimental cluster depth‐profiling in SIMS and XPS. Our MD results show a dependence on cluster size as well as energy‐per‐atom. Using the exponent previously suggested by Paruch et al., we modified the Threshold model equation published previously to take this into account. The modified Threshold equation fits all our MD results extremely well, building on its success in fitting experimental sputter yield measurements.