Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy

@article{Shang2005AreTC,
  title={Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy},
  author={Aijing Shang and Karin Huwiler-M{\"u}ntener and Linda Korkor Nartey and Peter J{\"u}ni and Stephan D{\"o}rig and Jonathan A. C. Sterne and Daniel Pewsner and Matthias Egger},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={2005},
  volume={366},
  pages={726-732}
}
View on Elsevier
albertovannelli.it
768 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
19
Background Citations
167
Methods Citations
21
Results Citations
30

Figures and Tables from this paper

768 Citations

Reinterpreting homoeopathy in the light of placebo effects to manage patients who seek homoeopathic care: A systematic review.
TLDR
Qualitative syntheses show that homoeopathy efficacy can be considered comparable to placebo, and that OLP treatments may be effective in some health conditions.
Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
Medicines prescribed in individualised homeopathy may have small, specific treatment effects and the low or unclear overall quality of the evidence prompts caution in interpreting the findings.
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects?
A systematic review of homoeopathy for the treatment of fibromyalgia
TLDR
The effectiveness of homoeopathy as a symptomatic treatment for FM remains unproven, because all RCTs suggested results that favour homoeopathic treatment, and important caveats exist.
Placebo effect sizes in homeopathic compared to conventional drugs - a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
HOMEOPATHIC TREATMENT OF HEADACHES & MIGRAINE: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
TLDR
The results of the meta-analysis are not compatible with the notion that homeopathy has significant effect beyond placebo, and the evidences are not convincing because of methodological inconsistencies and are too insufficient to arrive at a definite conclusion.
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
TLDR
A meta-analysis of all extractable data leads to rejection of the null hypothesis that the main outcome of treatment using a non-individualised (standardised) homeopathic medicine is indistinguishable from that of placebo, but analysis of a small sub-group of reliable evidence does not support that rejection.
Veterinary homeopathy: meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.
  • R. Mathie, J. Clausen
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Homeopathy : the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy
  • 2015
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Other-than-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Individualised Homeopathic Treatment.
TLDR
Current data preclude a decisive conclusion about the comparative effectiveness of IHT, but future OTP-controlled trials in homeopathy should aim, as far as possible, to promote both internal validity and external validity.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Other-than-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Non-Individualised Homeopathic Treatment.
TLDR
The current data preclude a decisive conclusion about the comparative effectiveness ofNIHT, and the highest intrinsic quality was observed in the equivalence and non-inferiority trials of NIHT.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 123 REFERENCES
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials
Clinical trials of homoeopathy.
TLDR
The evidence of clinical trials is positive but not sufficient to draw definitive conclusions because most trials are of low methodological quality and because of the unknown role of publication bias, which indicates that there is a legitimate case for further evaluation of homoeopathy, but only by means of well performed trials.
Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy.
The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture.
TLDR
The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in three areas of complementary medicine was highly variable and the majority had important shortcomings in reporting and/or methodology.
A double blind, placebo controlled study of piroxicam in the management of acute musculoskeletal disorders.
TLDR
Piroxicam was significantly better than placebo in improving patient signs and symptoms, and in its overall efficacy (P less than 0.001) and over 90% of patients in both treatment groups had good or excellent toleration.
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
TLDR
Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review
ABC of complementary medicine. Homoeopathy.
TLDR
In what is often termed “classical” homoeopathy, practitioners attempt to identify the single medicine that corresponds to a patient’s general “constitution”—a complex picture incorporating current illness, medical history, personality, and behaviour.
...
...