Are some animals also moral agents?

@article{Johannsen2019AreSA,
  title={Are some animals also moral agents?},
  author={Kyle Johannsen},
  journal={Animal Sentience},
  year={2019}
}
  • Kyle Johannsen
  • Published 1 January 2019
  • Philosophy, Psychology, Biology
  • Animal Sentience
: Animal rights philosophers have traditionally accepted the claim that human beings are unique, but rejected the claim that our uniqueness justifies denying animals moral rights. Humans were thought to be unique specifically because we possess moral agency. In this commentary, I explore the claim that some nonhuman animals are also moral agents, and I take note of its counter-intuitive implications. 
Scepticism about moral superiority
: Chapman & Huffman suggest that we might change people’s behavior toward animals by resisting an argument that because humans are intellectually superior to animals, they are also morally superior
An interest‐based rights ethic for wildlife management and applications to behavioral training
The growing field of conservation and wild animal ethics has the potential to guide practitioners facing difficult management decisions. Drawing from previously established rights frameworks, we
Refining thoughts about human/nonhuman differences
Our commentators come from many fields and disciplines and express highly divergent views, illustrating broad interest in the question. From the breadth of comments, we have identified two recurring

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
Human and nonhuman animals: Equals in uniqueness
TLDR
It is suggested that humans are unique with regard to cognitive fluidity, although the same conclusions can be reached via another argument based on human uniqueness.
Why do we want to think humans are different
One harmful consequence of creating categories where one group is unique and superior to others is that it justifies committing negative, often atrocious, acts on the members of the inferior group.
Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights
1. Introduction PART I: AN EXPANDED THEORY OF ANIMAL RIGHTS 2. Universal Basic Rights for Animals 3. Expanding ART via Citizenship Theory PART II: APPLICATIONS 4. Domesticated Animals within ART 5.
The Case for Animal Rights
There are, I know, people who profess to believe in animal rights but do not avow these goals. Factory farming, they say, is wrong—it violates animals’ rights—but traditional animal agriculture is
Stable isotope evidence of meat eating and hunting specialization in adult male chimpanzees
TLDR
The results reinforce behavioral observations of male-dominated hunting and meat eating in adult Taï chimpanzees, suggesting that sex differences in food acquisition and consumption may have persisted throughout hominin evolution, rather than being a recent development in the human lineage.
Chimpanzee rights: The philosophers' brief
  • 2018
Are whales smarter than we are? Scientific American: Mind Matters
  • 2008
Stable isotope evidence
  • 2013
Chimpanzee rights: The philosophers
  • Animal
  • 2018