Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing?

@article{Hubbard1992AreNR,
  title={Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing?},
  author={Raymond Hubbard and J. Scott Armstrong},
  journal={Marketing Letters},
  year={1992},
  volume={3},
  pages={127-136}
}
Editorial procedures in the social and biomedical sciences are said to promote studies that falsely reject the null hypothesis. This problem may also exist in major marketing journals. Of 692 papers using statistical significance tests sampled from theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, andJournal of Consumer Research between 1974 and 1989, only 7.8% failed to reject the null hypothesis. The percentage of null results declined by one-half from the 1970s to the 1980s. TheJM and… 

Preregistration as a way to limit questionable research practice in advertising research

Abstract This paper discusses two phenomena that threaten the credibility of scientific research and suggests an approach to limiting the extent of their use in advertising research. HARKing

Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature Review and Publication Audit

We examined three approaches to research in marketing: exploratory hypotheses, dominant hypothesis, and competing hypotheses. Our review of empirical studies on scientific methodology suggests that

Marketing Papers Wharton School April 2007 Significance Tests Harm Progress in Forecasting

It is concluded that tests of statistical significance harm scientific progress, and to analyze and communicate findings from empirical studies, one should use effect sizes, confidence intervals,ications/extensions, and meta-analyses.

2 Significance Tests Harm Progress in Forecasting

Prior literature that concludes that tests of statistical significance harm scientific progress are summarized and a statistical analysis of the M3-Competition results is examined, finding errors in original conclusions about the value of combining forecasts and about the selection of error measures.

Significance Tests Harm Progress in Forecasting

4-1-2007 Significance Tests Harm Progress in Forecasting

It is concluded that tests of statistical significance harm scientific progress, and to analyze and communicate findings from empirical studies, one should use effect sizes, confidence intervals,replications/extensions, and meta-analyses.

Null-hypothesis significance tests in behavioral and management research: We can do better

Null-hypothesis significance tests (NHST) are a very troublesome methodology that dominates the quantitative empirical research in strategy and management. Inherent limitations and inappropriate

Inter-study and intra-study replications in leading marketing journals: a longitudinal analysis

Purpose The authors aimed to examine the presence and character of inter- and intra-approaches to replication studies published in five leading marketing journals (Journal of Marketing,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES

Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis

The consequences of prejudice against accepting the null hypothesis were examined through (a) a mathematical model intended to stimulate the research-publication process and (b) case studies of

How good is peer review?

Peer review now stands to receive the same scrutiny as the work being reviewed, particularly in view of recent cases in which fraudulent reports appeared in scientific journals.

The Consequences of Journal Editorial Policies and a Suggestion for Revision

  • E. Feige
  • Economics
    Journal of Political Economy
  • 1975
The state of the art of any social science is largely embodied in its journal literature. Since this literature is so central in determining both the current and future direction and nature of

Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa

Abstract There is some evidence that in fields where statistical tests of significance are commonly used, research which yields nonsignificant results is not published. Such research being unknown to

The test of significance in psychological research.

  • D. Bakan
  • Psychology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1966
The test of significance does not provide the information concerning psychological phenomena characteristically attributed to it; and a great deal of mischief has been associated with its use. The

The File Drawer Effect and Publication Rates in Menstrual Cycle Research

The file drawer problem refers to a publication bias for positive results, leading to studies which support the null hypothesis being relegated to the file drawer. The assumption is that researchers

Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science

Justification, in the vernacular language of philosophy of science, refers to the evaluation, defense, and confirmation of claims of truth. In this article, we examine some aspects of the rhetoric of

Estimating Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

A central assumption of meta-analysis is that the sample of studies fairly represents all work done in the field, published and unpublished. However, if studies with “poor” results are less likely to

Publication bias and clinical trials.

Statistical Power and Effect Size in Marketing Research

How better attention to statistical power and effect size can improve the planning, execution, and reporting of marketing and consumer research is discussed.