Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition

@article{Aerts2022AreWT,
  title={Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition},
  author={Diederik Aerts and Lester Beltran},
  journal={Entropy},
  year={2022},
  volume={24}
}
In previous research, we showed that ‘texts that tell a story’ exhibit a statistical structure that is not Maxwell–Boltzmann but Bose–Einstein. Our explanation is that this is due to the presence of ‘indistinguishability’ in human language as a result of the same words in different parts of the story being indistinguishable from one another, in much the same way that ’indistinguishability’ occurs in quantum mechanics, also there leading to the presence of Bose–Einstein rather than Maxwell… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

A Planck Radiation and Quantization Scheme for Human Cognition and Language
TLDR
It is shown that the lack of independence of the Bose-Einstein statistics compared to the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics can be explained by the presence of a ‘meaning dynamics’, which causes words to be attracted to the same words.
Epistemological and ontological aspects of quantum theory
In this paper, epistemology and ontology of quantum states are discussed based on a completely new way of founding quantum theory. The fundamental notions are conceptual variables in the mind of an
Quantum Structure in Human Perception
We wish to investigate the ways in which the quantum structures of superposition, contextuality, and entanglement have their origins in human perception itself, given how they are sucessfully used to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 147 REFERENCES
Quantum Bose-Einstein Statistics for Indistinguishable Concepts in Human Language
TLDR
It is shown that the Bose–Einstein’s provides a better fit as compared to the Maxwell–Boltzmann's distributions and the Kullback–Leibler divergence method helps to identify evidence for this hypothesis.
On the Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum and Relativity Theories
How can we explain the strange behavior of quantum and relativistic entities? Why do they behave in ways that defy our intuition about how physical entities should behave, considering our ordinary
Einstein’s quantum theory of the monatomic ideal gas: non-statistical arguments for a new statistics
In this article, we analyze the third of three papers, in which Einstein presented his quantum theory of the ideal gas of 1924–1925. Although it failed to attract the attention of Einstein’s
Testing Quantum Models of Conjunction Fallacy on the World Wide Web
TLDR
It is found that ‘emergence effects’, and not ‘order effects”, should be considered the main cognitive mechanism producing the observed conjunction fallacies.
Quantum Structure in Cognition: Why and How Concepts Are Entangled
TLDR
It is shown that the intrinsic and unavoidable character of entanglement can be explained in terms of the weights of the exemplars of the combined concept with respect to the weightsof the exemplar of the component concepts.
Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision
TLDR
The foundations for modelling probabilistic-dynamic systems using two aspects of quantum theory, 'contextuality' and 'quantum entanglement', are introduced, which allow cognitive phenomena to be modeled in non-reductionist ways.
Quantum Particles as Conceptual Entities: A Possible Explanatory Framework for Quantum Theory
We put forward a possible new interpretation and explanatory framework for quantum theory. The basic hypothesis underlying this new framework is that quantum particles are conceptual entities. More
Effectiveness of the quantum-mechanical formalism in cognitive modeling
  • S. Sozzo
  • Computer Science
    Soft Comput.
  • 2017
TLDR
A general quantum-theoretic modeling scheme is applied to represent two types of cognitive situations where deviations from classical probability occur in human decisions, namely, ‘conceptual categorization’ and ‘decision making’.
...
...