Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought

  title={Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought},
  author={J. Norton},
  journal={Canadian Journal of Philosophy},
  • J. Norton
  • Published 1996
  • Philosophy
  • Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Whatever the original intent, the introduction of the term 'thought experiment' has proved to be one of the great public relations coups of science writing. For generations of readers of scientific literature, the term has planted the seed of hope that the fragment of text they have just read is more than mundane. Because it was a thought experiment, does it not tap into that infallible font of all wisdom in empiricist science, the experiment? And because it was conducted in thought, does it… Expand
When Are Thought Experiments Poor Ones?
A characteristic of contemporary analytic philosophy is its ample use of thought experiments. We formulate two features that can lead one to suspect that a given thought experiment is a poor one.Expand
On thought experiments as a priori science
Abstract Against Norton's claim that all thought experiments can be reduced to explicit arguments, I defend Brown's position that certain thought experiments yield a priori knowledge. They do this, IExpand
Tracing the Development of Thought Experiments in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences
SummaryAn overview is provided of how the concept of the thought experiment has developed and changed for the natural sciences in the course of the 20th century. First, we discuss the existingExpand
On the Very Idea of a Thought Experiment
If imagination is free to wander about in a thought experiment, without anything equivalent to the principle of reality able to intervene, is it ever possible that a thought experiment would not workExpand
In part because "imagination" is a slippery notion, its exact role in the production of scientific knowledge remains unclear. There is, however, one often explicit and deliberate use of imaginationExpand
Thought Experiments in Philosophy: A Neo-Kantian and Experimentalist Point of View
The paper addresses the question of the nature and limits of philosophical thought experiments. On the one hand, experimental philosophers are right to claim that we need much more laboratory work inExpand
Norton and the Logic of Thought Experiments
John D. Norton defends an empiricist epistemology of thought experiments, the central thesis of which is that thought experiments are nothing more than arguments. Philosophers have attempted toExpand
Thought Experiments in Science
Thought experiments are a means of imaginative reasoning with an employment record longer than two and a half thousand years. Used by Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Maxwell, and Einstein, theyExpand
Galileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment
By carefully examining one of the most famous thought experiments in the history of science-that by which Galileo is said to have refuted the Aristotelian theory that heavier bodies fall faster thanExpand
Galileo and the Indispensability of Scientific Thought Experiment
  • T. Gendler
  • Philosophy
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1998
By carefully examining one of the most famous thought experiments in the history of science—that by which Galileo is said to have refuted the Aristotelian theory that heavier bodies fall faster thanExpand


Thought experiments since the scientific revolution
Only the untutored would say that science began in the seventeenth century, but this historical period did mark a difference in the way things were done. The most common view of the ScientificExpand
In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling
  • N. Nersessian
  • Psychology
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1992
Thought experiments have played a prominent role in numerous cases of conceptual change in science. I propose that research in cognitive psychology into the role of mental modeling in narrativeExpand
The Science of Mechanics: a Critical and Historical Account of its Development
MACH completed the first edition of “The Science of Mechanics” at Prague in 1883. An English translation (by McCormack) appeared just ten years later, and of this two further editions embodying theExpand
Mach's principle : from Newton's bucket to quantum gravity
This volume is a collection of scholarly articles on the Mach Principle, the impact that this theory has had since the end of the 19th century, and its role in helping Einstein formulate the doctrineExpand
Experiment and the Making of Meaning