• Corpus ID: 204761859

Are Online Reviews of Physicians Biased Against Female Providers?

@inproceedings{Thawani2019AreOR,
  title={Are Online Reviews of Physicians Biased Against Female Providers?},
  author={Avijit Thawani and Michael J. Paul and Urmimala Sarkar and Byron C. Wallace},
  booktitle={MLHC},
  year={2019}
}
Patients increasingly seek out information regarding their healthcare online. Online reviews of caregivers in particular may influence from whom patients seek treatment. Are these sources biased against female providers? To address this question we analyze a new dataset of online patient reviews of male and female healthcare providers with respect to numerical ratings and language use. We perform both regression and (data-driven) qualitative analyses of language via neural embedding models… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Physician Gender, Patient Risk, and Web-Based Reviews: Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Physicians’ Gender and Their Web-Based Reviews
TLDR
This study conducts a longitudinal empirical investigation of the relationship between physician gender and their web-based reviews using data across the state of Alabama and finds that female physicians receive lower web- based ratings than male physicians even after accounting for several clinical characteristics associated with the physicians and temporal effects.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews
TLDR
A probabilistic generative model that captures latent sentiment across aspects of care (eg, interpersonal manner) and can recover important information from online physician reviews is described, facilitating large-scale analyses of such reviews.
What Affects Patient (Dis)satisfaction? Analyzing Online Doctor Ratings with a Joint Topic-Sentiment Model
TLDR
This work analyzes patient reviews of doctors using a novel probabilistic joint model of topic and sentiment based on factorial LDA and reports the most representative words with respect to positive and negative sentiment along three clinical aspects.
What Patients Say About Their Doctors Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis
TLDR
It is reaffirmed that the care encounter extends beyond the patient–physician dyad; staff, access, and convenience all affect patient’s reviews of physicians.
Quantifying Mental Health from Social Media with Neural User Embeddings
TLDR
This paper estimates user embeddings for a set of users known to be affected by depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and assesses the performance of downstream mental health prediction models based on these features.
A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period
TLDR
Online physician rating is rapidly growing in popularity and becoming commonplace with no evidence that they are dominated by disgruntled patients, and there exist statistically significant correlations between the value of ratings and physician experience, board certification, education and malpractice claims.
What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study
TLDR
Online reviews for US emergency departments (EDs) posted on Yelp suggest that online reviews for EDs contain similar themes to survey-based assessments of inpatient hospital care as well as themes specific to emergency care.
Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor
TLDR
A primacy effect was found for negative reviews such that readers were less willing to use the physician's services when negative reviews were presented before positive reviews, rather than after.
Patients' Satisfaction With Male Versus Female Physicians: A Meta-analysis
TLDR
Female physicians are not evaluated as highly by their patients, relative to male physicians, as one would expect based on their practice style and patients' values.
Women Doctors Don’t Get the Credit They Deserve
TLDR
Decades of research in nonclinical populations show that women in general are more relationship-oriented and egalitarian in their attitudes and conversational style, more expert in “reading” others’ personality and emotions, more skilled in nonverbal communication, and higher scoring on measures of emotional intelligence compared to men.
...
...