Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976-1998

@article{Adams2006AreNP,
  title={Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976-1998},
  author={James Adams and Michael Ty Clark and Lawrence Ezrow and Garrett Glasgow},
  journal={American Journal of Political Science},
  year={2006},
  volume={50},
  pages={513-529}
}
Do “niche” parties—such as Communist, Green, and extreme nationalist parties—adjust their policies in response to shifts in public opinion? Would such policy responsiveness enhance these parties' electoral support? We report the results of statistical analyses of the relationship between parties' policy positions, voters' policy preferences, and election outcomes in eight Western European democracies from 1976 to 1998 that suggest that the answer to both questions isno. Specifically, we find no… 

Tables from this paper

Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence

The spatial model of elections identifies factors that motivate party elites to shift their policy positions, including changes in voters' policy preferences, rival parties' policy shifts, past

Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies

A central tenet of spatial modeling and political representation studies is that, to the extent that citizens vote prospectively, they evaluate the policies that political parties are currently

Why Parties Change -- or Do They?: Citizen Perceptions of the Partisan Landscape

Implicit in any theory of democratic elections is the idea of change - or at least the potential for change. Elections provide the opportunity for citizens to change their party preferences and thus

Party Shifts and Electoral Penalties: Testing Theories of Party Competition in Britain

Do parties lose voters due to ideological shifts? I f parties suffer penalties then they can also be constrained from adapting, ye t this widely cited assumption of party competition theories has not

Voter discounting of party campaign manifestos: An analysis of mainstream and niche parties in Western Europe, 1971–2011

Election campaigns are supposed to inform voters about where parties stand on policy issues. Yet campaign promises are not binding, since parties may advocate some policies in the campaign and

What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organization, Goals and Ideology

A landmark finding in recent research on party competition is that parties differ in how they react to public opinion shifts. In their influential study, Adams et al. find that niche parties – which

Do voters learn? Evidence that voters respond accurately to changes in political parties’ policy positions

Abstract A premise of the mass–elite linkage at the heart of representative democracy is that voters notice changes in political parties’ policy positions and update their party perceptions

Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe

Earlier research has concluded that European citizens do not update their Left–Right policy preferences or their party attachments in response to the content of parties’ election manifestos – i.e.

Does the Ideological Dispersion of Parties Mediate the Electoral Impact of Valence? A Cross-National Study of Party Support in Nine Western European Democracies

Previous empirical research has found evidence suggesting that the character-based valence attributes of parties, such as competence and integrity, can have notable effects of levels of electoral
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 85 REFERENCES

Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?

Previous research explains the evolution of parties' ideological positions in terms of decision rules that stress the uncertainty of the political environment. The authors extend this research by

Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success

What accounts for variation in the electoral success of niche parties? Although institutional and sociological explanations of single-issue party strength have been dominant, they tend to remove

When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancingin Parliamentary Elections

  • Orit Kedar
  • Economics
    American Political Science Review
  • 2005
This work develops and tests a theory of voter choice in parliamentary elections. I demonstrate that voters are concerned with policy outcomes and hence incorporate the way institutions convert votes

Candidates’ policy platforms and election outcomes: The three faces of policy representation

.  Recent empirical studies by Alvarez and Nagler, Erikson and Romero, and others conclude that candidates’ and parties’ policy platforms only modestly affect their electoral support. This suggests

Modeling the interaction of parties, activists and voters: Why is the political center so empty?

The formal stochastic model of voting should be the theoretical benchmark against which empirical models can be gauged. A standard result in the formal model is the 'mean voter theorem' stating that

Party Policy: Decision Rule or Chance? A Note on Budge's New Spatial Theory of Party Competition

  • G. Burt
  • Economics, Political Science
    British Journal of Political Science
  • 1997
Increasingly in political science, models are developed and tested against datasets which have quite complicated structures. Sometimes it happens that the standard statistical tests are not directly

Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election

We offer a model of multiparty elections that combines voters' retrospective economic evaluations with consideration of parties' issue positions and the issue preferences of voters. We show that both

Spatial Models of Party Competition

The use of spatial ideas to interpret party competition is a universal phenomenon of modern politics. Such ideas are the common coin of political journalists and have extraordinary influence in the

Spatial Models of Candidate Competition and the 1988 French Presidential Election: Are Presidential Candidates Vote-Maximizers?

Existing applications of spatial modeling to historical elections suggest that parties rarely maximize votes. This complicates the analyst's task because explanations of party behavior must

A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors

1. Modeling party competition 2. How voters decide: the components of the unified theory of voting 3. Linking voter choice to party strategies: illustrating the role of non-policy factors 4. Factors
...