Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?

@article{RossHellauer2018AreFO,
  title={Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?},
  author={Tony Ross-Hellauer and Birgit Schmidt and Bianca Kramer},
  journal={SAGE Open},
  year={2018},
  volume={8}
}
As open access (OA) to publications continues to gather momentum, we should continuously question whether it is moving in the right direction. A novel intervention in this space is the creation of OA publishing platforms commissioned by funding organizations. Examples include those of the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation, as well as recently announced initiatives from public funders like the European Commission and the Irish Health Research Board. As the number of such platforms… 

Figures from this paper

Advancing open access in the Netherlands after 2020: from quantity to quality
The purpose of this article is to explore options to further open access in the Netherlands from 2021. Its premise is that there is a need to look at the qualitative aspects of open access, alongside
Open to the public: paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing
TLDR
A critique of the current academic publishing ecosystem is outlined, a discussion of the open access debate from a public perspective is re-focused, and some of the arguments against public open access are responded to.
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review
Open Science holds the promise to make scientific endeavours more inclusive, participatory, understandable, accessible and re-usable for large audiences. However, making processes open will not per
Dynamics of Cumulative Advantage and Threats to Equity in Open Science - A Scoping Review
TLDR
The results identify threats to equity associated with all aspects of Open Science, including Open Access, Open/FAIR Data, Open Methods, Open Evaluation, Citizen Science, as well as its interfaces with society, industry and policy.
Some Issues on the Funding of the Scientific Publication in Open Access
TLDR
For this new way of publishing science to grow in a sustained way, it is necessary to ensure the existence of independent scientific advisory boards; freedom of publication within certain boundaries; a sustainability strategy to plan for the operation of the platform; transparency in public scrutiny; and respect for the law.
Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities
Open research represents a new set of principles and methodologies for greater cooperation, transparent sharing of findings, and access to and re-use of research data, materials or outputs, making
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
TLDR
This article overviews the essential components of the comprehensive approach, increasing transparency, adherence to ethical standards, and diversification of evaluation metrics needed for a comprehensive approach to Open Access.
Open Access Policy in the UK: From Neoliberalism to the Commons
This thesis makes a contribution to the knowledge of open access through a historically and theoretically informed account of contemporary open access policy in the UK (2010–15). It critiques
Korea’s national approach to Open Science: Present and possible future
Open Science (OS) – an emerging global trend driven by advances in digital technologies and government’s commitment to greater transparency and value for money of publicly funded research – is at its
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
TLDR
This work analyses peer review to assess where the major gaps in theoretical and empirical understanding of it lie, and identifies core themes including editorial responsibility, the subjectivity and bias of reviewers, the function and quality of peer review, and the social and epistemic implications ofpeer review.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 58 REFERENCES
Open access to the research literature: a funders perspective
Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts
The adoption of open access (OA) policies that require participation rather than request it is often accompanied by concerns about whether such mandates violate researchers’ academic freedoms. This
How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals
TLDR
There is evidence that the current APC‐funded full OA market is sensitive to journal prestige/impact, and a value‐based cap funding scheme is presented which could help maintain transparency, bringing hybrid market pricing in line with the full Oa market.
Securing the Future of Open-Access Policies
TLDR
The study looked at critical challenges facing OA services, including uncertainties over their financial stability and governance models, that hamper – or can hamper in the future – their effective use and continued development, and highlighted priorities for action from decision makers in the scholarly community.
The OpenAIRE2020 FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Implementing a European-wide funding initiative for Open Access publishing costs
TLDR
The opportunities and challenges faced by this FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot are addressed and early project findings six months into this two-year initiative are discussed.
Hybrid open access - A longitudinal study
Publishing priorities of biomedical research funders
TLDR
Publicly funded and large biomedical research funders are committed to open access publishing and are pleased with recent developments which have stimulated growth in this area, but are concerned about the practical implications for their budgets and their funded researchers.
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers
TLDR
The results of this cross-disciplinary survey show the majority of respondents to be believe that OPR as a general concept should be mainstream scholarly practice, and high levels of support for most of the traits of OPR, particularly open interaction, open reports and final-version commenting.
Drivers and Implications of Scientific Open Access Publishing: Findings from a Pilot OECD International Survey of Scientific Authors
This paper presents the results of a new and experimental study on the research and publishing activities of scientific authors. It also aimed to test the feasibility of an OECD global survey on
Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access
TLDR
The strong, fact-based case is made for a large-scale transformation of the current corpus of scientific subscription journals to an open access business model, to preserve the established service levels provided by publishers that are still requested by researchers, while redefining and reorganizing the necessary payment streams.
...
...