Are Adjustments Insufficient?

@article{Epley2004AreAI,
  title={Are Adjustments Insufficient?},
  author={N. Epley and T. Gilovich},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2004},
  volume={30},
  pages={447 - 460}
}
  • N. Epley, T. Gilovich
  • Published 2004
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Many judgmental biases are thought to be the product of insufficient adjustment from an initial anchor value. Nearly all existing evidence of insufficient adjustment, however, comes from an experimental paradigm that evidence indicates does not involve adjustment at all. In this article, the authors first provide further evidence that some kinds of anchors (those that are self-generated and known to be incorrect but close to the correct answer) activate processes of adjustment, whereas others… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: do people adjust from provided anchors?
Electrophysiological correlates of adjustment process in anchoring effects
Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences.
Failures to replicate a key result of the selective accessibility theory of anchoring.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES
Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors
A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.
The limits of anchoring.
Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring
Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility
The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.
Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks
...
1
2
3
4
5
...