Archaeology: the Loss of Innocence

  title={Archaeology: the Loss of Innocence},
  author={David L. Clarke},
We p.S#&$ IQst year two mticles dealing with the a i m and relevante of the so-called 'nem first was by Professor Richrd Watson (1972, 210-15) and the second by ,301-4). We also pubhhed a r h by David C h k e of 'Explanation tson, S. A . LeBlanc and C. L. Redman (1972, 237-9). Here, nd Tutor of Peterhouse, Cambridge, sets out his com'dered views archaeology, some of which he has already dkeussed in h& book 'Analytical mchaeologyY. 
Symbolic cognitive archaeology: A new loss of innocence
The historical evidence is there, in its primary form, not to disclose its own meaning, but to be interrogated by minds trained in a discipline of attentive disbelief. ... Each age, or eachExpand
Taphonomy and Paleoecology: A Critical Review of Archaeology's Sister Disciplines
Earthlings are great explainers, explaining why this event is structured as it is, telling how other events may be achieved or avoided. I am a Tralfamadorian, seeing all time as you see the RockyExpand
Just Methodology? A Review of Archaeology’s Debts to Michael Schiffer
Michael Schiffer’s Behavioral Archaeology is one of several moves in mid- to late twentieth century archaeology toward actualistically based, detailed materials analysis with the aim of developingExpand
Whither processualism?
The philosopher David Hull’s Science as a Process (1988) inspired O’Brien et al. to write a book which constructs a history of Americanist archaeology by tracing intellectual lineages whileExpand
‘The loss of innocence’ in historical perspective
The dual tasks of this paper are to examine David Clarke’s ideas about the development of archaeology as they relate both to the era when ‘the loss of innocence’ was written and to what has happenedExpand
“The Age of Innocence”: Personal Histories of the 1960s “Digging Circuit” in Britain
There is a substantial literature on the use of oral history in archaeology, but there has been little consideration of the kinds of oral history and memory produced by the practice of archaeology.Expand
When I came to the conference on ' Economic Archaeology' I was more than a little taken aback by the desire of most of those present to want to talk about ' Social Archaeology' instead. I suppose IExpand
Divided We Stand: Aspects of Archaeology and Information
The role of the New Archaeology of the 1960s is recognized as decisive in the history of archaeology: an awakening from the “long sleep of archaeological theory” from about 1880 to 1960. But at theExpand
A Panorama of Theoretical Archaeology
  • L. Klejn
  • Sociology
  • Current Anthropology
  • 1977
Initial considerations. I the last 15 years, the interest of archaeologists in the general problems of their discipline-philosophical, methodological, logical, and theoretical-and in those which linkExpand
On (very) new and (extremely) critical archaeologies, or why one may remain forever eighteen years behind the truly new
Contemporary archaeologies are complex and diverse. It is easier to find things that differentiateprehistoric archaeology, for example, (e.g. Childe 1929) from the archaeology of the contemporaryExpand


Problems in “Avant‐Garde” Archaeology1
“Avant-garde” archaeology has emphasized the use of statistics and social-scientific reconstruction, but has fallen into a state of partial confusion and error. Its failings involve aExpand
Laws, Systems, and Research Designs: A Discussion of Explanation in Archaeology
Archaeology must come to grips with the basic philosophical problems of science. With this premise in mind, we welcome the recent article on explanation by Fritz and Plog (1970) and offer a reviewExpand
Notes on the Synthesis of Form
The search for the right components, and the right way to build the form up from these components, is the greatest challenge faced by the modern, selfconscious designer. Expand
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.
Part I. Introduction: 1. The general theory 2. The postulates of the classical economics 3. The principle of effective demand Part II. Definitions and Ideas: 4. The choice of units 5. Expectation asExpand
Models in archaeology
The philosophies of science (Oxford)
  • HODSON, F. R., D. G. KENDALL and P. TAUTU (eds.).
  • 1972
Reply to the comments on analytical archaeology
Notes on the synthesis of fonn (Harvard)
  • D. L. 1968. Anaiytical mchaeology (London).
  • 1964