ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process

  title={ArXiv rejections lead to spat over screening process},
  author={Zeeya Merali},
  • Z. Merali
  • Published 29 January 2016
  • Psychology
  • Nature
High-profile physicist says his students' papers were wrongly rejected by the preprint server's volunteer moderators. 
Fake Archives: The Search for Openness in Scholarly Communication Platforms
brands have long been regular features of the commercial world, scholarship is increasingly dealing with a similar phenomenon. Appropriating a successful brand is indeed a way to tap into the value
Preprint Déjà Vu
Twenty‐five years ago, in August 1991, I spent a couple of afternoons at Los Alamos National Laboratory writing some simple software that enabled a small group of physicists to share drafts of their articles via automated email transactions with a central repository, which experienced both expansion in coverage and heavy growth in usage that continues to this day.
AI Definitions Affect Policymaking
In this issue brief, CSET puts forward a functional definition of AI, based on three core principles, that significantly outperforms methods developed over the last decade.
Preprint Déjà Vu: an FAQ
This commentary originally appeared in the EMBO Journal, is reposted here with permission (and minor updates), and provides some overall context.
Preprint paper platforms in the academic scholarly communication environment
The scope and policies of the existing preprint papers platforms in different academic research fields are explored, including their significance in promoting scientific discovery, the potential risks of scientific integrity, as well as the policies of data distribution and intellectual property rights.