Aquinas’s Account of Double Effect

  title={Aquinas’s Account of Double Effect},
  author={Thomas A. Cavanaugh},
  journal={The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review},
  pages={107 - 121}
  • T. Cavanaugh
  • Published 5 April 2017
  • Philosophy
  • The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Comparaison de la conception thomiste du double effet et de la forme contemporaine du raisonnement du double effet. Examinant les notions de risque, responsabilite et intention qui sous-tendent l'expose thomiste, l'A. montre que la doctrine contemporaine du double effet ne peut se reclamer de Saint Thomas D'aquin tout court et ne peut justifier le cas d'un homicide par autodefense 

The Doctrine of Double Effect and the Domains of Moral Responsibility

En ce qui concerne la doctrine du double effet, l'A. montre que pour Thomas d'Aquin, nous avons seulement l'intention de la fin, et non pas des moyens. Il en arrive ainsi a souligner que Thomas


Rejetant la these selon laquelle la distinction entre l'intentionnel et le prevu n'etablit pas une difference importante au regard de la responsabilite ethique de l'agent qui agit mal, l'A. montre

Proportionalism and the Pill: How Developments in Theory Lead to Contradictions to Practice

L'article est consacre a l'encyclique Humanae Vitae et plus particulierement aux arguments moraux avances pour ou contre la contraception, notamment le proportionnalisme la justifiant sous certaines

Praeter Intentionem in Aquinas and Issues in Bioethics

The two propositions in Aquinas from which the so-called doctrine of double-effect arises are (1) actions are morally specified (“receive their species”) according to what is intended (“id quod

A Critical Reflection on Utilitarianism as the Basis for Psychiatric Ethics, Part I: Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory

The notion of maximizing pleasure, or avoiding pain, seems an intuitive raison d’être, and indeed forms the basis of a body of moral philosophies dating from antiquity. Ethical hedonism, first

The Doctrine of Double Effect

The aim of the article is to present some of the differences and similari- ties in various versions of the double effect principle (DDE or PDE). The following formulations will be analyzed: that of


Utilitarianism is one of the “grand Enlightenment” moral philosophies. It provides a means of evaluating the ethical implications of common and unusual situations faced by psychiatrists, and offers a

The Morality of National Defense: An Aristotelian-Thomist Account

In current just war theory debates, some scholars claim that a moral right to defend a nation cannot be demonstrated. Others claim that any case for the morality of even defensive war must reflect

A Long Discussion Regarding Steven A. Long’s Interpretation of the Moral Species

L IKE STEVEN LONG1 I am disturbed by the view maintaining that crushing a baby's skull is not necessarily an act of killing the baby; yet I am unconvinced by his counter analysis of Aquinas. The

Metaphysical and Ethical Perspectives on Creating Animal-Human Chimeras

An Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysical framework is elucidated in which to argue how animal-human (a-h) chimeras ought to be defined ontologically, and when the creation of, and experimentation upon, certain types of a-h chimers may be morally permissible.



Toward Understanding the Principle of Double Effect

The Principle of Double Effect (hereafter PDE) has long been a mainstay of Catholic moral thinking.' In recent years, however, the use and discussion of this doctrine have not been limited to

Praeter Intentionem in Aquinas

H ENRY SIDGWICK MAINTAINED that one must intend the foreseen consequences of acts.1 More recent philosophers have asserted propositions about intention which are in agreement with Sidgwick's view at

Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect.

John Quinn examines the DDE using three pairs of contrasting cases and concludes that certain forms of forced strategic subordination are especially inappropriate among free and equal agents.

The theory of morality

"Let us . . . nominate this the most important theoretical work on ethical or moral theory since John Rawls's "Theory of Justice." If you have philosophical inclinations and want a good workout, this

Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism.

Nuclear deterrence deserves rigorous, objective ethical analysis. In providing it, the authors of this book face realities - the Soviet threat, possible nuclear holocaust, strategic imperatives - but

War and justice