Apportionment Behind the Veil of Uncertainty

@article{Wada2016ApportionmentBT,
  title={Apportionment Behind the Veil of Uncertainty},
  author={J. Wada},
  journal={Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal},
  year={2016}
}
  • J. Wada
  • Published 2016
  • Economics
  • Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal
  • Apportionment of representatives is a basic rule of everyday politics. By definition, this basic rule is a constitutional stage problem and should be decided behind the veil of uncertainty. To bring apportionment closer to quotas, we introduce f‐divergence for utilitarianism and Bregman divergence for consistent optimization. Even in our less restricted condition, we find that we must use α‐divergence for optimization and show that the minimization of α‐divergence induces the same divisor… CONTINUE READING
    2 Citations
    Studying malapportionment using α-divergence
    • 4

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
    Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function
    • 5
    House monotone apportionment schemes.
    • G. Birkhoff
    • Medicine, Mathematics
    • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    • 1976
    • 28
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The Geometry of Voting
    • 91
    • PDF
    The Nash Social Welfare Function
    • 126
    • PDF
    $\alpha$ -Divergence Is Unique, Belonging to Both $f$-Divergence and Bregman Divergence Classes
    • S. Amari
    • Computer Science, Mathematics
    • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
    • 2009
    • 115
    • Highly Influential
    α-divergence is unique, belonging to both f-divergence and Bregman divergence classes
    • 33
    • Highly Influential
    Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. By Michel L. Balinski and H. Peyton Young
    • 118
    • Highly Influential
    The apportionment of representatives in Congress
    • 67
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    The Sainte-Laguë Method for Solving an Apportionment Problem
    • Public Choice Studies
    • 1991