Applying novel methods to assess clinical outcomes: insights from the TRILOGY ACS trial.

  title={Applying novel methods to assess clinical outcomes: insights from the TRILOGY ACS trial.},
  author={Jeffrey A. Bakal and Matthew T. Roe and E Magnus Ohman and Shaun G. Goodman and Keith A. A. Fox and Yinggan Zheng and Cynthia M. Westerhout and Judith S. Hochman and Yuliya V Lokhnygina and Eileen B. Brown and Paul Wayne Armstrong},
  journal={European heart journal},
  volume={36 6},
AIMS Several methods provide new insights into understanding clinical trial composite endpoints, using both conventional and novel methods. The TRILOGY ACS trial is used as a contemporary example to prospectively compare these methods side by side. METHODS AND RESULTS The traditional time-to-first-event, Andersen-Gill recurrent events method, win ratio, and a weighted composite endpoint (WCE) are compared using the randomized, active-control TRILOGY ACS trial. This trial had a neutral result… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 18 times. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.


Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 15 extracted citations

Reanalysis or redefinition of the hypothesis?

European heart journal • 2015
View 5 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

The stratified win ratio.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics • 2018
View 2 Excerpts


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 13 references

Impactof weightedcomposite compared to traditional composite endpoints for the design of randomized controlled trials

WesterhoutCM Bakal JA, ArmstrongPW
Stat Methods Med Res • 2012

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…