Application of the FTOPSIS ranking method to an industrial facility location problem
@inproceedings{Puente2015ApplicationOT, title={Application of the FTOPSIS ranking method to an industrial facility location problem}, author={Javier Puente and Isabel Fern{\'a}ndez and Jes{\'u}s Simal Lozano and Borja Ponte and Paolo Priore and David de la Fuente}, year={2015} }
Industrial location problems belong to the scope of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) given the high number of attributes to be considered in its planning and analysis. This work deals with a problem with four potential sites and five influential subjective criteria. A panel of experts related to the problem makes a fuzzy valuation of these attributes allowing to capture the uncertainty inherent in the subjectivity of such assessments-. Similarly, using the AHP method, experts provide with…
One Citation
15 References
A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for facility site selection
- Computer Science
- 1991
By utilizing this decision algorithm, the decision-makers’ fuzzy assessments with various rating attitudes and the trade-off among various selection criteria can be taken into account in the aggregation process to asssure more convincing and accurate decision-making.
A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes
- BusinessEur. J. Oper. Res.
- 2008
A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty
- Economics, BusinessMath. Comput. Model.
- 2011
A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
- Economics
- 2014
In infrastructure management, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) has emerged as a decision support tool to integrate various technical information and stakeholder values. Different MCDM techniques…
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Ratio and Difference Judgement
- Economics, Sociology
- 1999
1. Introduction. 2. SMART, direct rating. 3. The AHP, pairwise comparisons. 4. Scale sensitivity and rank preservation. 5. The alternatives in perspective. 6. Group decision making. 7. Resource…