Ants versus spiders: interference competition between two social predators

@article{Yip2014AntsVS,
  title={Ants versus spiders: interference competition between two social predators},
  author={Eric C. Yip},
  journal={Insectes Sociaux},
  year={2014},
  volume={61},
  pages={403-406}
}
  • E. Yip
  • Published 17 September 2014
  • Environmental Science
  • Insectes Sociaux
Interference competition can profoundly influence the outcome of species interactions and may lead to either coexistence or exclusion. Our understanding of how interference can lead to coexistence remains incomplete, particularly when interference fails to result in resource partitioning. I document a novel form of interference competition between an ant (Myrmecia pyriformis) and a social spider (Delena cancerides) with similar foraging patterns. Of 120 nest boxes occupied by D. cancerides in… 

Collective personalities: present knowledge and new frontiers

TLDR
It is concluded that collective personality, as a framework, has the potential to improve the general understanding of how selection acts on intraspecific variation in collective phenotypes that are of key importance across arthropod societies and beyond.

Effects on running speed of changes in sexual size dimorphism at maturity on in the cursorial huntsman spider, Delena cancerides (Sparassidae)

  • Jacob A HurstL. S. Rayor
  • Biology
    Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology
  • 2021
TLDR
For sparassids spiders without large SSD, lower mass and longer legs translate into lower energetic costs of running distances for males, due to their lighter mass.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

Interference competition and species coexistence

  • P. Amarasekare
  • Environmental Science
    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
  • 2002
TLDR
The results hold regardless of whether the resource is biotic or abiotic, indicating that the outcome of exploitative and interference competition does not depend on the exact nature of resource dynamics.

Do social spiders cooperate in predator defense and foraging without a web?

TLDR
Young spiders benefited directly from maternal defense and prey sharing in the retreat, and older spiders gained no foraging benefit by remaining in their natal colony, suggesting D. cancerides does not share many of the benefits of group living described in other web-building social spiders.

Interference competition and niche theory.

  • T. CaseM. Gilpin
  • Economics
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1974
TLDR
The incorporation of interference into niche theory clarifies the competitive phenomenon of unstable equilibrium points, excess density compensation on islands, competitive avoidance by escape in time and space, the persistence of the "prudent predator," and the magnitude of the difference between the size of a species' fundamental niche and its realized niche.

Interference Competition and the Coexistence of Two Competitors on a Single Limiting Resource

TLDR
This model demonstrates the theoretical possibility that two species jointly limited by the same energy resource can coexist at a globally stable equilibrium point and reveals that, in this case, coexistence depends upon species' interference as well as resource exploitation properties.

Interspecific interference behaviours by workers of the harvesting ant Messor capitatus (Hymenoptera Formicidae)

TLDR
A behavioural task group of workers (defined as ‘sappers’) that have a direct detrimental effect on colony activity of heterospecific congeneric competitors are identified.

Ecology and Evolution of Resource-Related Heterospecific Aggression

TLDR
Comparisons between situations where a focal species is allopatric from and sympatric with a heterospecific competitor provide better opportunities to test hypotheses aboutHA, and aggression was higher with increased resource overlap as expected, both because CA was greater than HA, and HA was greater within compared to between genera.

Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition

  • T. Schoener
  • Environmental Science
    The American Naturalist
  • 1983
TLDR
Competition was found in 90% of the studies and 76% of their species, indicating its pervasive importance in ecological systems, and the Hairston-Slobodkin-Smith hypothesis concerning variation in the importance of competition between trophic levels was strongly supported.

Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species

TLDR
Two hypotheses which may explain two different patterns which underlie coexistence in two species of desert gerbils are temporal partitioning of foraging activity and shared preference habitat selection.

Foraging ecology of the night-active bull ant Myrmecia pyriformis

TLDR
It is found that most foragers make only one foraging journey per night, leaving the nest at dusk twilight and returning during dawn twilight, and evidence that foragers imbibe liquid food while abroad and likely share these resources via trophallaxis once within the nest.