Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science

@article{Kukla1996AntirealistEO,
  title={Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science},
  author={A. Kukla},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1996},
  volume={63},
  pages={S298 - S305}
}
  • A. Kukla
  • Published 1996
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific realists have argued that the truth(likeness) of our theories provides the only explanation for the success of science. I consider alternative explanations proposed by antirealists. I endorse Leplin's contention that neither van Fraassen's Darwinist explanation nor Laudan's methodological explanation provides the sort of explanatory alternative which is called for in this debate. Fine's suggestion--that the empirical adequacy of our theories already explains their success--is more… CONTINUE READING
    18 Citations
    Ontological Order in Scientific Explanation
    • 6
    • PDF
    A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific Antirealism
    • 12
    Abduction and Scientific Realism
    • 2
    A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific
    • PDF
    Why Should We Be Pessimistic About Antirealists and Pessimists?
    • 15
    • PDF
    Selection and Predictive Success
    • 22

    References

    SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
    A Confutation of Convergent Realism
    • 953
    • PDF
    A novel defense of scientific realism
    • 219
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Quantum Theory and Explanatory Discourse: Endgame for Understanding?
    • 46
    Mathematics, Matter, And Method
    • 338
    The Scientific Image
    • 3,308
    Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to Science
    • 159