Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science

@article{Kukla1996AntirealistEO,
  title={Antirealist Explanations of the Success of Science},
  author={Andr{\'e} Kukla},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1996},
  volume={63},
  pages={S298 - S305}
}
  • A. Kukla
  • Published 1 September 1996
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
Scientific realists have argued that the truth(likeness) of our theories provides the only explanation for the success of science. I consider alternative explanations proposed by antirealists. I endorse Leplin's contention that neither van Fraassen's Darwinist explanation nor Laudan's methodological explanation provides the sort of explanatory alternative which is called for in this debate. Fine's suggestion--that the empirical adequacy of our theories already explains their success--is more… 
The Anti-Realist Explanation for Science’s Success: Semantics, Method and Attitude
Antirealist explanations for the success of science have been widely discussed up to today and have received several formulations. This makes it rather complex to assess them all. The objective of
The Coincidentalist Reply to the No-Miracles Argument
Proponents of the no-miracles argument contend that scientific realism is “the only philosophy that doesn’t make the success of science a miracle.” Bas van Fraassen argued, however, that the success
Ontological Order in Scientific Explanation
TLDR
It is argued that Stanford's proposal has a conceptual flaw and respects the ontological order between properties and a dependent property is to be explained in terms of its underlying property, not the other way around.
Two Tokens of the Inference to the Best Explanation: No-Miracle Argument and the Selectionist Explanation
In this paper, I evaluate van Fraassen’s critique of the Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) by focusing mainly on his argument of bad lot. First, I argue that his attack is about the reliability
A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific Antirealism
There are nine antirealist explanations of the success of science in the literature. I raise difficulties against all of them except the latest one, and then construct a pessimistic induction that
Abduction and Scientific Realism
Scientific realism claims that theories in natural science are attempts to describe a mind-independent reality. Such theories explain and predict observable phenomena, but their content refers to
A Pessimistic Induction against Scientific
There are nine antirealist explanations of the success of science in the literature. I raise difficulties against all of them except the latest one, and then construct a pessimistic induction that
Scientific realism in the philosophy of science and international relations
This thesis sets out to challenge the assumption widely held among IR scholars that Scientific Realism (SR) is the definite and final interpretation of realism. The introduction of SR into IR as the
Why Should We Be Pessimistic About Antirealists and Pessimists?
The pessimistic induction over scientific theories (Poincaré in Science and hypothesis, Dover, New York, 1905/1952) holds that present theories will be overthrown as were past theories. The
Selection and Predictive Success
TLDR
The nature of van Fraassen’s selectionist explanation for the success of science is clarified and it is argued that the plausibility of the realists’ explanation rests on an inaccurate understanding of the nature of predictive success.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
A Confutation of Convergent Realism
  • L. Laudan
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1981
This essay contains a partial exploration of some key concepts associated with the epistemology of realist philosophies of science. It shows that neither reference nor approximate truth will do the
A novel defense of scientific realism
Vigorous and controversial, this book develops a sustained argument for a realist interpretation of science, based on a new analysis of the concept of predictive novelty. Identifying a form of
Does every theory have empirically equivalent rivals?
The instrumentalist argument from the underdetermination of theories by data runs as follows: (1) every theory has empirically equivalent rivals; (2) the only warrant for believing one theory over
Explaining the Success of Science: Beyond Epistemic Realism and Relativism
Throughout the first half of the eighteenth century, scientific opinion concerning the structure of the cosmos was deeply polarized; numerous “systems of the world” found their advocates among
Quantum Theory and Explanatory Discourse: Endgame for Understanding?
Empirical adequacy, formal explanation and understanding are distinct goals of science. While no a priori criterion for understanding should be laid down, there may be inherent limitations on the way
Mathematics, Matter, And Method
Introduction 1. Truth and necessity in mathematics 2. The thesis that mathematics is logic 3. Mathematics without foundations 4. What is mathematical truth? 5. Philosophy of physics 6. An examination
The Scientific Image
In this book van Fraassen develops an alternative to scientific realism by constructing and evaluating three mutually reinforcing theories.
Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to Science