Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries

@article{Zahedi2017AntiCounterfeitingTA,
  title={Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries},
  author={M. Zahedi and Mohammad Erfanmanesh and N. Houshmand},
  journal={Bioethics},
  year={2017},
  volume={7},
  pages={45-62}
}
Background and Aim: Among the existing agreements to protect intellectual property rights, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has set the highest level of enforcement standards. This study tries to clarify and identify differences between the ACTA provisions and innovations with other international regulations and its effects on the universal access to medicines in developing countries. Materials and Methods: In this qualitative research, document analysis method was applied. By… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES
Trips-Plus Agenda Through Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Implications for India
In recent years, the developed countries have launched many initiatives and measures to tighten the enforcement of intellectual property. The aim is to get developing countries to take on TRIPS-PlusExpand
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) – Implications on Developing Countries with Focus on Generic Medicines
TLDR
Though the final text of ACTA was released in May 2011, it was finally on 1st October, 2011 that eight participants out of eleven involved in the rounds of negotiations signed ACTA in Tokyo. Expand
Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first
  • J. Lexchin
  • Economics, Medicine
  • Globalization and Health
  • 2013
TLDR
Canada has failed in its humanitarian duty to protect the human right to health in the form of safe and low cost medicines for the people in developing countries because it prioritized intellectual property rights over access. Expand
ACTA - Risks of Third-Party Enforcement for Access to Medinces
In its current near-final draft form, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement [ACTA] being negotiated plurilaterally — and largely secretly — by a self-selected group of countries proposes to allowExpand
Politics, compromise, text and the failures of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (‘ACTA’) was concluded in December 2010 after three years of controversy-plagued negotiations. This plurilateral agreement seeks to set new internationalExpand
A Case Against the ACTA
The Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is being considered by the Obama Administration as an Executive Order. If signed, this Order will greatly enhance controls placed at the borders of 36Expand
Six Secret (and Now Open) Fears of ACTA
  • P. Yu
  • Political Science
  • 2010
In April 2009, Japan, the United States, the European Community, and other negotiating parties of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement released a joint consolidated draft of the once-secretExpand
From TRIPS to ACTA: Towards a New 'Gold Standard' in Criminal IP Enforcement?
International intellectual property (IP) law has moved from the absence of any obligations on criminal IP enforcement in the ‘pre-TRIPS era’ to a flexible international minimum standard embodied inExpand
Collateral Damage: The Impact of ACTA and the Enforcement Agenda on the World's Poorest People
ACTA is billed as a trade agreement, and it is likely to have a far reaching impact on the poorest people in the world. ACTA's purported aim is to increase the efficacy of enforcement of intellectualExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...