Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat

@article{Calvillo2016AnimateOA,
  title={Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat},
  author={Dustin P. Calvillo and Whitney C. Hawkins},
  journal={The Journal of General Psychology},
  year={2016},
  volume={143},
  pages={101 - 115}
}
ABSTRACT Inattentional blindness occurs when individuals are engaged in an attention-demanding task and fail to detect unexpected objects in their visual field. Two experiments examined whether certain unexpected objects are more easily detected than others. The unexpected objects were animate and threatening (e.g., snake), animate and nonthreatening (e.g., bird), inanimate and threatening (e.g., gun), or inanimate and nonthreatening (e.g., bed). Three hypotheses were tested: the snake… 

Chasing Animals With Split Attention: Are Animals Prioritized in Visual Tracking?

Moderate to strong evidence is found that images of animals do not improve positional tracking, do not act as more effective distractors, are not selected prior to artifacts in the response phase, and are not easier to monitor for changes in size.

Threat-relevant stimuli cannot be better detected by preschoolers in an inattentional blindness task

It is demonstrated that the threat-superiority effect on IB does not occur on preschoolers and the individual difference of preschoolers' IB is unstable, and the cognition of young children's attentional bias to threat-relevant stimuli is enriched.

Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task

It is found that it took longer to process the ink colour of animate than inanimate words, providing further evidence that animates are prioritised in processing because their fitness value is higher than that of inanimates.

Animacy's Effect on Attention and Memory in Humans and Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Neither antisaccade or symbolic match-to-sample tasks showed a significant difference in attention to or memory for animate versus inanimate stimuli with human participants, suggesting that the animacy effect does not hold true for picture stimuli.

Curvilinear features are important for animate/inanimate categorization in macaques

It is shown that, with nominal training, naïve macaques could classify a trial-unique set of 1000 novel images with high accuracy and, without training, macaques can use an intermediate image feature, curvilinearity, to facilitate their categorization of animate and inanimate objects.

Are animates special? Exploring the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning

The findings support the notion that visual statistical learning is a powerful mechanism by which the visual system resolves an abundance of sensory input over time.

Animacy and threat in recognition memory

The results of the studies suggest that the animacy and threat effects in memory are robust and that attention capture might be at least partly responsible for the Animacy effect.

Adaptive memory: Animacy, threat, and attention in free recall

A norming study was first conducted to aid in the creation of lists of threatening and non-threatening animate and inanimate items, and two experiments were conducted to determine if the animacy effect persisted regardless of the threat level of the items.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness

The effects of animacy and perceptual load on inattentional blindness are examined and the results are consistent with the animate-monitoring hypothesis, which suggests that animate objects capture attention because of the importance of the detection of animate objects in ancestral hunter–gatherer environments.

How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness

A new approach to the study of sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events is presented in order to explore the roles of similarity, distinctiveness, and attentional set in the detection of unexpected objects.

Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events

A new study builds on classic studies of divided visual attention to examine inattentional blindness for complex objects and events in dynamic scenes and suggests that the likelihood of noticing an unexpected object depends on the similarity of that object to other objects in the display and on how difficult the priming monitoring task is.

Distinct processing for pictures of animals and objects: evidence from eye movements.

The results highlighted the attentional bias to animate parts of a picture and clarified that the effects of category, valence, and picture context interacted to influence attentional allocation.

How Meaning Shapes Seeing

The results showed that an unexpected stimulus belonging to the attended semantic category but not sharing physical features with the attended stimuli was detected more often than a semantically unrelated stimulus, implying that the semantic relation between the observer's attentional set and the unexpected stimulus plays a crucial role in inattentional blindness.

The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: are guns noticed as quickly as snakes?

A visual search task was used to test the hypothesis that an evolved fear module is preferentially activated by stimuli that are fear relevant in a phylogenetic sense, and showed that both guns and snakes attracted attention more effectively than neutral stimuli.

Animates are better remembered than inanimates: further evidence from word and picture stimuli

The findings provide further evidence for the functionalist view of memory championed by Nairne and coworkers and suggest that animacy enhances not only the quantity but also the quality of memory traces, through the recall of contextual details of previous experiences.

Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli?

  • I. Blanchette
  • Psychology
    Quarterly journal of experimental psychology
  • 2006
In three experiments, the efficiency in detecting fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant visual stimuli are compared and the threat-superiority effect was repeatedly found for both types of target.

Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise

Evidence is presented that subjects are substantially faster and more accurate at detecting changes in animals relative to changes in all tested categories of inanimate objects, even vehicles, which they have been trained for years to monitor for sudden life-or-death changes in trajectory.

Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy.

These data provide the first evidence of enhanced visual detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infants and hence offer especially strong support for the existence of a general bias for the Detection of threat in humans.