Analyzing Strategic Nuclear Policy

@inproceedings{Glaser1990AnalyzingSN,
  title={Analyzing Strategic Nuclear Policy},
  author={Charles L. Glaser},
  year={1990}
}
With sweeping changes in the Soviet Union and East Europe having shaken core assumptions of U.S. defense policy, it is time to reassess basic questions of American nuclear strategy and force requirements. In a comprehensive analysis of these issues, Charles Glaser argues that even before the recent easing of tension with the Soviet Union, the United States should have revised its nuclear strategy, rejecting deterrent threats that require the ability to destroy Soviet nuclear forces and forgoing… 
No First Use: The Next Step for U.S. Nuclear Policy
The release of the Barack Obama administration's much-anticipated Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) concluded an intense, yearlong effort to revamp U.S. nuclear weapons policy to better address modern
Parity, What is it Good For? Jimmy Carter and the Legitimation of Nuclear Strategy
In 1976, Americans elected Jimmy Carter on a promise of arms control and a reduced role for nuclear weapons in U.S. military strategy. While Carter remained committed to arms control, he ultimately
The Nuclear Balance and International Conflict
There is reason to believe that the nuclear balance between states is an important determinant of international conflict, but recent international relations scholarship either ignores nuclear weapons
Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe
T h e end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union have generated extensive interest in redesigning Europe’s security structures. Cold War dangers have dramatically receded, raising
Beyond Emboldenment: The Effects of Nuclear Weapons on State Foreign Policy
What happens to the foreign policies of states when they acquire nuclear weapons? Despite its critical importance, this question has been understudied. This paper offers a new typology of the effects
Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional Adversaries: Prospects for Neutralization, Strategies for Escalation Management
Abstract : Over the course of the 21st century, the international environment is likely to evolve in ways that present unprecedented challenges to the national security of the United States. One of
The False Promise of International Institutions
Since the Cold War ended, Western policymakers have sought to create security arrangements in Europe, as well as in other regions of the globe, that are based on international institutions. In doing
The Limits of Damage Limitation
as international relations theory suggests, rapid shifts in the balance of power, such as that which would occur if the United States abandoned nuclear advantages over China, would be destabilizing.6
Leveraging towards restraint: Nuclear hedging and North Korea's shifting reference points during the agreed framework and the Six-Party Talks
Abstract The emergence of new nuclear aspirants has posed a great threat to the post-Cold War global non-proliferation regime. These states have adopted a nuclear hedging strategy that has been
Should the United States Reject MAD? Damage Limitation and U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China
As China invests in its nuclear forces and U.S.-China relations become increasingly strained, questions of U.S. nuclear doctrine require greater attention. The key strategic nuclear question facing
...
...