An open letter to our readers on the use of antibodies

@article{Saper2005AnOL,
  title={An open letter to our readers on the use of antibodies},
  author={Clifford B. Saper},
  journal={Journal of Comparative Neurology},
  year={2005},
  volume={493}
}
  • C. Saper
  • Published 26 December 2005
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Journal of Comparative Neurology
The use of immunohistochemistry has become ubiquitous in neuroscience. A large majority of papers now published in The Journal of Comparative Neurology use immunohistochemistry, and some papers may employ a battery of ten or more antibodies to examine issues of colocalization or cell typing. This pattern has resulted in a flood of new information. . . .but also a flood of misinformation. The Journal has repeatedly, over the last few years, received distressed communications from authors, who… Expand
Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry
TLDR
The aims of the present paper are to increase the awareness of the difficulties in proving the specificity of immunocytochemical labeling and to initiate a discussion on optimized standards. Expand
Is my antibody‐staining specific? How to deal with pitfalls of immunohistochemistry
  • J. Fritschy
  • Biology, Medicine
  • The European journal of neuroscience
  • 2008
TLDR
This ‘Technical Spotlight’ discusses other pitfalls, which are often overlooked, although they can strongly influence the outcome of immunohistochemical experiments, and recapitulates the minimal set of information that should be provided in scientific publications to allow proper evaluation and replication of Immunohistochemistry experiments. Expand
Proper application of antibodies for immunohistochemical detection: antibody crimes and how to prevent them.
TLDR
In this review, the authors draw on many years of experience to illuminate many of the more common errors and problematic issues in immunohistochemistry, and how these may be avoided. Expand
Strategies for immunohistochemical protein localization using antibodies: What did we learn from neurotransmitter transporters in glial cells and neurons
TLDR
The extent of the problem, the nature of the pitfalls and a practical strategy for researchers who plan to embark on a localization study are described are described and proposed. Expand
Antibodies for immunolabeling by light and electron microscopy: not for the faint hearted
TLDR
The problems associated with the very complicated issue of trying to establish that an antibody (and the results obtained with it) is specific for the immunolabeling approaches used in light or electron microscopy are discussed. Expand
Specificity Controls for Immunocytochemistry
TLDR
The authors argue against uncritical use of the preadsorption test and address a number of other issues related to immunocytochemistry specificity testing, showing how this can give an illusion of specificity and illustrating sensitivity-specificity relationships. Expand
Comment from the Editor‐in‐Chief on correspondence in this issue on immuno‐techniques
  • J. McGrath
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • British journal of pharmacology
  • 2011
TLDR
In this issue of BJP the authors publish two letters commenting on the use of immunolabelling techniques, one concerned with Western Blots and the other with the need for inclusion of rigorous control data when reporting experiments employing immunotechniques. Expand
Localization of a Wide-Ranging Panel of Antigens in the Rat Retina by Immunohistochemistry
TLDR
Davidson’s fixative was less compatible with certain antibodies, such as the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid, the microglial marker iba1, the macroglial stress protein nestin, and the small heat shock proteins Hsp27 and αB-crystallin, shortfalls that somewhat temper enthusiasm concerning its use. Expand
The effect of journal guidelines on the reporting of antibody validation
TLDR
The results suggest that the implementation of antibody reporting guidelines might have some influence on the reporting of antibody validation information, but these guidelines mostly seem to improve antibody identification instead of actual experimental validation. Expand
Recommendations for description and validation of antibodies for research use
TLDR
It is high time that journals take a lead and enforce full and correct descriptions of experimental data obtained with antibodies that also contain validation data on antibodies that are used, and several journals currently request data on antibody specificity and validation within the text or in the form of a table. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...