An objective nuclear accident magnitude scale for quantification of severe and catastrophic events

@article{Smythe2011AnON,
  title={An objective nuclear accident magnitude scale for quantification of severe and catastrophic events},
  author={David Smythe},
  journal={Physics Today},
  year={2011}
}
  • David Smythe
  • Published 12 December 2011
  • Environmental Science
  • Physics Today
Deficiencies in the existing International Nuclear Event Scale (INES)[1] have become clear in the light of comparisons between the 1986 Chernobyl and 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accidents.[2–4] First, the scale is essentially a discrete qualitative ranking, not defined beyond event level 7. Second, it was designed as a public relations tool, not an objective scientific scale. Third, its most serious shortcoming is that it conflates magnitude with intensity. 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents
TLDR
This study provides and analyzes a data set that is twice the size of the previous best data set on nuclear incidents and accidents, comparing three measures of severity: the industry standard International Nuclear Event Scale, the Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale of radiation release, and cost in U.S. dollars.
Calculating nuclear accident probabilities from empirical frequencies
AbstractSince there is no authoritative, comprehensive and public historical record of nuclear power plant accidents, we reconstructed a nuclear accident data set from peer-reviewed and other
Disaster Risk Analysis Part 2: The Systemic Underestimation of Risk
Abstract How risk is defined, the nature of methodologies used to assess risk, and the degree to which rare events should be included in a disaster risk analysis, are important considerations when
Learning how to Learn from Failures: The Case of Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
In this work, it is argued that learning from failures and safety competence should be an important part of the curriculum of Engineering and Management students. The case of Fukushima will be used
Multiple Outlier Detection in Samples with Exponential & Pareto Tails: Redeeming the Inward Approach & Detecting Dragon Kings
TLDR
Tests are found to be highly sensitive to the correct specification of the main distribution (Exponential/Pareto), exposing high potential for errors in inference and advocating a density mixture approach for detecting clustered outliers.
References
  • Industrial and Medical Nuclear Accidents
  • 2019
Predicting Future Fukushimas: A Response to Dr. Walden’s Criticism
Scholars generally post preprints or non-reviewed manuscripts to public archives such as arXiv so that they can solicit independent feedback from colleagues and researchers at large. The idea is to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF REACTOR ACCIDENT IN A-1 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT JASLOVSKE BOHUNICE
The facts about reactor accidents in A-1 Nuclear Power Plant Jaslovske Bohunice, Slovakia are presented. There was the reactor KS150 (HWGCR) cooled with carbon dioxide and moderated with heavy water.
A Review of Criticality Accidents 2000 Revision
Criticality accidents and the characteristics of prompt power excursions are discussed. Sixty accidental power excursions are reviewed. Sufficient detail is provided to enable the reader to
Dietary intakes and internal exposure doses received by residents of the Karachai Trace
Abstract. Due to several radioactive accidents at the Mayak Production Association, a facility for production of weapon plutonium put on line in 1948 in the Southern Urals (Russia), an substantial
Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident,
  • 2009
Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority, Report to the Chairman of the Hungarian Atomic Energy Commission on the Authority’s Investigation of the Incident at Paks Nuclear Power Plant on
  • International Conference Center Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan,
  • 2003
Proposition One , “ Let the Facts Speak , 1975 - 1979
    Environ. Health Perspect
    • 2000
    TMI Assessment , part 2 ( 1995 ) . 4 . A . Gundersen , “ Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident , ” video lecture ( 2009 ) . 5 . M . C . Hatch et al . , Am
    • . J . Epidemiol . Environ . Health Perspect .
    • 1997
    ...
    ...