An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: the Maastricht Progress Test.

Abstract

The increasing international mobility of medical students has inspired the search for an international assessment format. As one step along this line, kinetics of knowledge acquisition and final cognitive levels of students were compared among one Dutch, one German and four Italian medical faculties. For this comparison, the Maastricht Progress Test (MPT) was used. For four out of the six participating faculties, it was possible to compare the level of knowledge of sixth-year students. These data showed no significant differences on the test as a whole. On the other hand, as judged from cross-sectional data on students from all study years, the kinetics of knowledge acquisition showed different trends. In one school applying problem-based learning, acquisition of knowledge by students occurred almost linearly. In another school, over the first 2 years, acquisition of knowledge occurred only in the basic sciences but not in clinical or public health/behavioural sciences. In two other schools over that same period, students seemed to gain no knowledge at all. In some faculties, a marked boost in knowledge was noted with third- or fourth-year students. These findings may be explained by peculiarities of the respective curricula, selection of students during their studies, and national or local assessment procedures. It is preliminarily concluded that the different educational approaches and assessment systems in medical education in Europe seem to have only limited influence on the final level of knowledge of the graduates. On the other hand, these differences may influence the kinetics of knowledge acquisition, especially in distinct domains like basic or clinical sciences. Therefore, the MPT may not be suitabe to solve the problem of assessment of individual international exchange students, but it may be helpful in identifying corresponding cognitive levels on, for example, basic sciences for students in different curricula.

Statistics

01020'03'05'07'09'11'13'15'17
Citations per Year

65 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 65 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Albano1996AnIC, title={An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: the Maastricht Progress Test.}, author={Marzia Albano and Francesco Cavallo and R J I Hoogenboom and F. Magni and Gerard D. Majoor and Federico Manenti and Lambert W. T. Schuwirth and I Stiegler and Cees P. M. van der Vleuten}, journal={Medical education}, year={1996}, volume={30 4}, pages={239-45} }