An integrated view of protein evolution

@article{Pl2006AnIV,
  title={An integrated view of protein evolution},
  author={Csaba P{\'a}l and Bal{\'a}zs Papp and Martin J. Lercher},
  journal={Nature Reviews Genetics},
  year={2006},
  volume={7},
  pages={337-348}
}
Why do proteins evolve at different rates? Advances in systems biology and genomics have facilitated a move from studying individual proteins to characterizing global cellular factors. Systematic surveys indicate that protein evolution is not determined exclusively by selection on protein structure and function, but is also affected by the genomic position of the encoding genes, their expression patterns, their position in biological networks and possibly their robustness to mistranslation… Expand

Figures from this paper

Evolutionary Analyses of Protein Interaction Networks
TLDR
The purpose of this chapter is to introduce methodologies for analyzing PPI data and to describe molecular evolution and comparative genomics insights gained from such studies. Expand
Chapter X Evolutionary Analyses of Protein Interaction Networks
TLDR
The purpose of this chapter is to introduce methodologies for analyzing PPI data and to describe molecular evolution and comparative genomics insights gained from such studies. Expand
Genome factor and gene pleiotropy hypotheses in protein evolution
TLDR
It is proposed that gene pleiotropy, the capacity for affecting multiple phenotypes, may play a vital role in molecular evolution. Expand
Why Proteins Evolve at Different Rates: The Determinants of Proteins’Rates of Evolution
TLDR
From the very beginning of molecular evolution studies, it became apparent that different proteins evolve at very different rates, each evolving according to its own “molecular clock”. Expand
Molecular evolution and gene function
TLDR
This chapter provides a brief overview of the problems associated with defining gene function in a manner which allows comparisons which are both large scale and evolutionarily relevant. Expand
Structure and function of naturally evolved de novo proteins.
TLDR
Since the existence of de novo proteins seems at odds with decade-long attempts to construct proteins with novel structures and functions from scratch, it is suggested that a better understanding of deNovo protein evolution may fuel new strategies for protein design. Expand
Inferring regulatory mechanisms from patterns of evolutionary divergence
TLDR
This work argues for a complementary approach that focuses on the divergence of regulatory programs, and reviews examples of this concept using yeast as a model system, and highlights a hybrid‐based approach that is highly instrumental in this analysis. Expand
Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution
TLDR
These studies found that the evolutionary rate of a protein is predominantly influenced by its expression level rather than functional importance, which indicates that selection against errors in molecular and cellular processes is important. Expand
Final report Genomic prediction of essential genes : an in silico approach
Perhaps one of the most striking discoveries of modern molecular genetics was the extent by which organisms appear to tolerate mutations or even complete loss of their genes. Systematic single geneExpand
Structural and functional constraints in the evolution of protein families
TLDR
The rate of amino acid substitution reflects both Darwinian selection for functionally advantageous mutations and selectively neutral evolution operating within the constraints of structure and function during neutral evolution. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 149 REFERENCES
Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network
TLDR
It is shown that the connectivity of well-conserved proteins in the protein interaction network is negatively correlated with their rate of evolution, confirming one predicted outcome of this process—namely, that interacting proteins evolve at similar rates. Expand
Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly.
TLDR
It is hypothesized that selection to reduce the burden of protein misfolding will favor protein sequences with increased robustness to translational missense errors, and genome-wide tests favor the translational robustness explanation over existing hypotheses that invoke constraints on function or translational efficiency. Expand
Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins
  • H. Fraser
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Nature Genetics
  • 2005
TLDR
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, protein interaction hubs situated in single modules are highly constrained, whereas those connecting different modules are more plastic, which could reflect a tendency for evolutionary innovations to occur by altering the proteins and interactions between rather than within modules. Expand
Lethality and centrality in protein networks
TLDR
It is demonstrated that the phenotypic consequence of a single gene deletion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is affected to a large extent by the topological position of its protein product in the complex hierarchical web of molecular interactions. Expand
Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution.
  • D. Wall, A. E. Hirsh, +4 authors M. Feldman
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2005
TLDR
This work estimated the evolutionary rates of >3,000 proteins in four species of the yeast genus Saccharomyces and investigated their relationship with levels of expression and protein dispensability, revealing independent, significant effects on the rate of protein evolution. Expand
The effect of multifunctionality on the rate of evolution in yeast.
TLDR
A highly significant negative correlation is found between the number of biological processes in which a gene is involved in and its rate of evolution, but the magnitude of this effect is small, and the results do not support the notion that multifunctionality limits a gene's rates of evolution. Expand
Systemic determinants of gene evolution and function
  • E. Koonin
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Molecular systems biology
  • 2005
TLDR
It is shown that essential genes, on average, should evolve slower than nonessential genes, and an intriguing paper by Fraser (2005) sheds light on some of the underlying mechanisms. Expand
The evolutionary rate of a protein is influenced by features of the interacting partners.
TLDR
It is found that proteins with DF-SP interactions evolve at the slowest rate of all the proteins examined. Expand
Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles.
TLDR
A "profile" solution is provided to the model that explains the hierarchical organization of proteins in fold families and agreement is found between predicted patterns of conserved amino acids and those actually observed in nature. Expand
Pharmacophylogenomics: genes, evolution and drug targets
  • D. Searls
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • 2003
TLDR
This view places increased emphasis on the comprehensive analysis of the evolutionary history of targets, in particular their orthology and paralogy relationships, the rate and nature of evolutionary change they have undergone, and their involvement in evolving pathways and networks. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...