An endoscopic Mayo score of 0 is associated with a lower risk of colectomy than a score of 1 in ulcerative colitis.


Dear Sir, In a recent article we showed that correlation between histological indexes is strong for ulcerative colitis (UC). Due to the lack of intervention studies and the absence of a validated histological index, histological healing cannot be considered as a treatment goal in clinical practice for these patients. Pending these studies, we need to define the therapeutic goal for patients with UC. In the ACT 1 and 2 clinical trials, early mucosal healing defined by an endoscopic Mayo score (EMS) of 0–1 was associated with a lower risk of colectomy through 54 weeks of follow-up evaluation and better long-term outcomes related to symptomatic remission, corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission and corticosteroid use, and subsequent mucosal healing at weeks 30 and 54. With the exception of colectomy outcomes, an EMS of 0 at week 8 was associated with a greater proportion of patients with long-term clinical benefit. Among patients with clinical remission at week 8, an EMS of 0 versus 1 did not predict subsequent colectomy, symptomatic remission, corticosteroid-free remission or sustained mucosal healing. However, the duration of follow-up was too short, only 54 weeks, to show a statistically significant difference between an EMS of 0 and an EMS of 1 in terms of colectomy rates. In a French multicentre study, we previously showed that patients with refractory UC who achieved mucosal healing after infliximab initiation had better long-term outcomes, with significantly less colectomy and less infliximab failure after a median follow-up duration of 27 months. However, we did not compare an EMS of 0 with an EMS of 1. Using a well defined referral centrebased cohort, namely the Nancy IBD cohort, we investigated whether an EMS of 0 may be associated with better outcomes than an EMS of 1 in UC. Patients with an established diagnosis of UC were followed until January 2014. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using a log rank statistic. Time to colectomy from the date of first endoscopic evaluation was calculated. Only patients with an EMS of 0 or 1 were included in the analysis. Of the 55 patients, 52.7% were women (n=29). The median age at diagnosis was 35.1 years. The mean age at first endoscopy was 40.7 years. According to the Montreal classification, 51% of patients had pancolitis, 32% had left-sided UC and 17% had proctitis. Eighteen patients (32.7%) had an EMS of 0 and 37 (67.3%) an EMS of 1 at first endoscopic evaluation after UC diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 8 out of 55 patients (14.5%) underwent colectomy and all of them had an EMS of 1. Comparing survival curves (figure 1), an EMS of 0 was associated with less colectomy than an EMS of 1 (p=0.05). In conclusion, an EMS of 0 may predict a lower need for colectomy than an EMS of 1 in patients with UC. An EMS of 0 could define the minimum therapeutic goal for patients with UC to change disease course. Whether histological healing is the ultimate therapeutic goal for patients with an EMS of 0 will require further investigation.

DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308839

1 Figure or Table

Citations per Year

135 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 135 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Manginot2015AnEM, title={An endoscopic Mayo score of 0 is associated with a lower risk of colectomy than a score of 1 in ulcerative colitis.}, author={Claire Manginot and Cedric Baumann and L Peyrin-Biroulet}, journal={Gut}, year={2015}, volume={64 7}, pages={1181-2} }