An analysis of the Washington Conference Report on bioanalytical method validation.

@article{Hartmann1994AnAO,
  title={An analysis of the Washington Conference Report on bioanalytical method validation.},
  author={Carsten Hartmann and Desire L. Massart and R. D. McDowall},
  journal={Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis},
  year={1994},
  volume={12 11},
  pages={1337-43}
}
The Washington Conference Report on bioanalytical method validation is analysed with respect to the requirements for precision and accuracy. It is shown that if the requirements are interpreted too literally, this could lead to disappointment in practice. A better approach is to separate the total measurement error into its constant (bias) and random (precision) components. To ensure that 95% of all methods fall within the acceptance interval of +/- 15% around the true value, would require, for… CONTINUE READING
12 Extracted Citations
0 Extracted References
Similar Papers

Citing Papers

Publications influenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…